Teams

GEPTA/18&over/3.5M/Garcia/EPTC#3

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

15 players · average NTRP 3.56 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2026 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Ezri Navarro
usually #2 Doubles 32%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.65
Erick Acosta
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #1 Doubles 19% · published 4
3.42
Enrique Darancou
usually #2 Singles 29%, also #2 Doubles 24% · published 3.5
3.31
Alejandro Contreras
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.20
Alejandro Abbud
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.13
Isaac Montes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
2.89
Enrique Roldan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.74
Cristian Lange
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Jordan Furman
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 27% · published
Juan Becerra
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Juan Pablo Pak
usually #1 Singles 35%, also #1 Doubles 23% · published
Luis Jacinto
usually #2 Doubles 54%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published
Mario Carrillo
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Pedro Ganem
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Pedro Ibarra
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Enrique Darancou + Pedro Ganem7166% gamesnot enough data
Enrique Roldan + Cristian Lange2343% gamesnot enough data
Cristian Lange + Jordan Furman224 matchesnot enough data
Alejandro Abbud + Juan Becerra314 matchesnot enough data
Enrique Roldan + Alejandro Abbud303 matchesnot enough data
Jordan Furman + Juan Becerra033 matchesnot enough data
Jordan Furman + Mario Carrillo123 matchesnot enough data
Enrique Darancou + Juan Becerra123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ezri Navarro
27W–8L career · 22 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Erick Acosta
18W–7L career · 15 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Enrique Darancou
30W–28L career · 16 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Alejandro Contreras
49W–42L career · 20 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Alejandro Abbud
52W–26L career · 7 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.20
3.5
Isaac Montes
7W–3L career · 10 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Enrique Roldan
26W–36L career · 3 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.89
3
Cristian Lange
36W–39L career · 12 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
2.74
Jordan Furman
28W–48L career · 15 lines in 2026
not enough data
Juan Becerra
26W–25L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Juan Pablo Pak
28W–4L career · 24 lines in 2026
not enough data
Luis Jacinto
9W–6L career · 13 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mario Carrillo
25W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Pedro Ganem
10W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Pedro Ibarra
20W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.