Teams

HRCA BLACK

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 3.30 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-21vs RRTC REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesNicola Zalkind / Jill Cooper vs Heather Kelly / Samantha Downing2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesTerry Fiala vs Christina Kent4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJill Cleverdon / Nancy Montini vs Kimberly Parks / Holly Smith7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCarol Parrish / Judy Mickelson vs Marla Roper / Crystal Higgins1-6, 2-6
2022-07-19vs VCC TEALSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJill Cleverdon / Nicole DiPasquale vs Dawn Baranek / Lisa Wells Thies3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNancy Montini vs Catherine Sinclair6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesNicola Zalkind / Jill Cooper vs Elizabeth Quinn / Teresa Hymowitz6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJudy Mickelson / Carol Parrish vs Dana Ricketts / Nickie Le7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2022-07-14vs LTFC ORANGELost 04
L#1 DoublesJill Cooper / Nicola Zalkind vs Carol Lugo / Chris Thulin3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesTerry Fiala vs Debbie Maloney6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesNicole DiPasquale / Jill Cleverdon vs Holly Payne / Cody Sherrod1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesCarol Parrish / Judy Mickelson vs Heidi David / Vickie Conroy5-7, 1-6
2022-07-07vs HRCA PINKSplit 22
L#1 DoublesNicole DiPasquale / Jill Cleverdon vs Kathy Dudek / Erin Maloney6-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesNancy Montini vs Anne McIntosh6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJudy Mickelson / Carol Parrish vs Cherie Weren / Elise Marks-Gruitch0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesNicola Zalkind / Jill Cooper vs Tanya Cote / Becky Nemec5-7, 4-4
2022-06-23vs CPV BLUESplit 22
W#1 DoublesJill Cooper / Nicola Zalkind vs Gina Lurie / Norine Nelson Martin7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesNancy Montini vs Megan Kendrick3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKristin Alexander / Nicole DiPasquale vs Lisa Wiggins / Natalie Vickers4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJudy Mickelson / Carol Parrish vs Judy Straub / Julie Heck1-6, 3-6
2022-06-16vs PRC GREENWon 21
L#1 DoublesJill Cooper / Nicola Zalkind vs Sujata Wagh / Wendy Mosley6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesNancy Montini vs Cheryl Ballard3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNicole DiPasquale / Carol Parrish vs Cindy Sanders / Denise Debartolomeis6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2022-06-09vs CCV REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesJill Cooper / Nicola Zalkind vs Melissa Rogers / Monica Bogue3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesTerry Fiala vs Ashley Wilson4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesNicole DiPasquale / Nancy Montini vs Maureen Breitenbach / Marne Melun6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCarol Parrish / Kristin Alexander vs Allyson Ross / Seon Comeau4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Nancy Montini
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Terry Fiala
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Nicola Zalkind
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.00
Kristin Alexander
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.82
Carol Parrish
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.64
Judy Mickelson
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Jill Cleverdon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Nicole DiPasquale
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Montini + Nicola Zalkind6355% games+6.3% vs expected
Jill Cleverdon + Nicole DiPasquale7850% games+4.9% vs expected
Nancy Montini + Carol Parrish252349% games+1.9% vs expected
Nicola Zalkind + Carol Parrish11338% games−4.4% vs expected
Judy Mickelson + Carol Parrish0728% games−9.4% vs expected
Nicola Zalkind + Jill Cleverdon3257% gamesnot enough data
Judy Mickelson + Nicola Zalkind044 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Montini + Jill Cleverdon224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Nancy Montini
119W–86L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Terry Fiala
93W–82L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Nicola Zalkind
69W–109L career · 7 lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.03
Kristin Alexander
27W–45L career · 2 lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.00
3
Carol Parrish
50W–96L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Judy Mickelson
35W–66L career · 5 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
2.64
Jill Cleverdon
14W–15L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nicole DiPasquale
14W–10L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.