Teams

MAC-Reykalin

2022 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.36 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Jeffrey Bayless
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Jim Lekas
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Mark Hudspeth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Philip Flemming
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
William Reykalin
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.86
Matthew Casimo
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Alan Peters
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Mark Rousseve
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 0
Ted Miller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 0
Results8 ties
2022-05-20Lost 02
L#1 DoublesPhilip Flemming / William Reykalin vs Pete Crystal / Douglas Walker6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAlan Peters / Mark Rousseve vs Doug Orr / Bill Sturman6-0, 6-7, 1-0
2022-05-05Won 30
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Bayless / Jim Lekas vs Steven Ryan / Dan Hostetler6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSteven Christenson / William Reykalin vs John McLain / Shirish Patel6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMatthew Casimo / Philip Flemming vs Gary McKenzie / Jim Cullison6-1, 6-2
2022-04-29Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Bayless / Jim Lekas vs Randy Boose / Vilath Oudomphong6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesDennis Freed / Alan Peters vs James Lang / Christopher Thomas7-5, 6-1
2022-04-21Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSteven Christenson / Mark Hudspeth vs Dennis Reed / Dan Hostetler3-4
L#2 DoublesMatthew Casimo / Ted Miller vs Gary Townsend / John Walsh6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesPhilip Flemming / Bruce Landrey vs John McLain / Shirish Patel6-0, 6-2
2022-04-08Lost 12
W#1 DoublesSteven Christenson / Mark Hudspeth vs John Bergin / Donny Cablao6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAlan Peters / Mark Rousseve vs Roland Jarka / Paul Koenigsberg6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPhilip Flemming / Fred Leonetti vs Charles Gebhardt / David Williams6-1, 6-2
2022-04-07Lost 03
L#1 DoublesPhillip Juckeland / William Reykalin vs Craig Frasier / David Williams6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMatthew Casimo / Mark Rousseve vs Donny Cablao / Charles Gebhardt6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesPhilip Flemming / Dennis Freed vs Roland Jarka / John Bergin6-3, 7-6
2022-03-31Split 11
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Bayless / Jim Lekas vs Jim George / Les Wellman6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesWilliam Reykalin / Mark Rousseve vs Michael Siebers / Randy Nicholson6-2, 6-1
2022-03-17Lost 12
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Bayless / Jim Lekas vs Bill Sturman / Bob McBride7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMatthew Casimo / Alan Peters vs Steve Thunstedt / Doug Orr7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesWilliam Reykalin / Fred Leonetti vs Robert Leitheiser / Jon Mandeville6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Jeffrey Bayless
130W–100L career
0%99%1%
3.30
3.5
Jim Lekas
22W–12L career
not enough data
3.5
Mark Hudspeth
5W–10L career
8%87%5%
3.25
3.5
Philip Flemming
4W–11L career
not enough data
3.5
William Reykalin
5W–14L career
not enough data
3
Matthew Casimo
40W–103L career
0%98%2%
2.86
3
Alan Peters
2W–21L career
not enough data
0
Mark Rousseve
3W–7L career
not enough data
0
Ted Miller
0W–1L career
not enough data

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.