Teams

Marco YMCA - Washak

2021 Collier Mixed 40 & Over Fall · Mixed 40 8.0 Fall

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2020-12-05vs Marco YMCA - MastrogiacomoWon 10
W#2 DoublesCarmelo Rubio / Sara Mcguinn vs Marianne Khayat / James Ray6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2020-11-28vs Pelican Marsh - BargerWon 20
W#2 DoublesAnthony Tarakdjian / Rachel Schenk vs Carolyn Benson / Gary Teng6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKaren Huffman / Carmelo Rubio vs Brenda Rhoda / Erik Rhoda6-1, 6-1
2020-11-14vs Pelican Bay North - RuffoloLost 02
L#1 DoublesSara Mcguinn / Carmelo Rubio vs Greg Strakosch / Peggy Strakosch1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAnthony Tarakdjian / Rachel Schenk vs Bob Wille / Debi Reed4-6, 5-7
2020-11-06vs Marco YMCA - MastrogiacomoWon 20
W#1 DoublesRachel Schenk / Stephen Kuhn vs James Ray / Brita Swanson6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSara Mcguinn / Carmelo Rubio vs Marianne Khayat / Doug Egem7-6, 6-4
2020-10-17vs Naples Grande - L. LaveryWon 10
W#3 DoublesCarmelo Rubio / Sara Mcguinn vs Lorrie Lavery / Michael Lavery6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 40 8.0 Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Kristy Cardina
published
3.85
Bobby Marks
published 4
3.80
Karen Huffman
published
3.77
Rachel Schenk
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.69
Andrea Washak
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.67
Stephanie Opel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
2.91
Carmelo Rubio
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
Leticia Lancsarics
published
Robert Steller
published
Sandra Steller
published
Stephen Kuhn
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carmelo Rubio + Andrea Washak4259% gamesnot enough data
Robert Steller + Sandra Steller033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristy Cardina
16W–18L career · no lines in 2021
51%49%<1%
4.00
4
Bobby Marks
18W–11L career · no lines in 2021
<1%86%13%
3.85
Karen Huffman
12W–20L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.80
Rachel Schenk
139W–70L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Andrea Washak
352W–306L career · 2 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Stephanie Opel
192W–136L career · 2 lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.67
3
Carmelo Rubio
254W–234L career · 8 lines in 2021
<1%76%24%
2.91
Leticia Lancsarics
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Robert Steller
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sandra Steller
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Stephen Kuhn
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.