Teams

Kinney/Memphis

2026 Combo 18 & Over - Memphis · 6.5 18 & Over Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-23vs McDaniel/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesMorgan Burton / Crista Mcmorran vs Jessie Williams / Audrey Darrohn3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJanet Grillis / Barbara Halliburton vs Kiersten Carey / Sumner Jefferson6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAngie Moore / Jodi Kendall vs Katie Kirton / Hart Kelman6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2026-08-16vs Lacy/MemphisSplit 11
W#2 DoublesTrisha Dooley / Jodi Kendall vs Susan Northen-Lacy / Deepa Nair6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesKate Linebarger / Candi McMorran vs Tracy Pope / Amasa Lacy3-6, 3-6
2026-08-09vs Nabors/ MemphisSplit 11
L#2 DoublesPENNY WILKINS / Janet Grillis vs Leigh Dill / Natalie McClure3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCourtney Neville / Jacqueline Smith vs Melissa Thomas / Libby Harris4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 18 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Courtney Neville
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.97
Angie Ware
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Janet Grillis
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.79
Crista Mcmorran
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
PENNY WILKINS
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
Angie Moore
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.57
Jodi Kendall
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.54
Brenda Kinney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.40
Jacqueline Smith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.40
Kate Linebarger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.37
Barbara Halliburton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.37
Candi McMorran
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacqueline Smith + Courtney Neville7066% games+12.4% vs expected
Candi McMorran + Angie Moore2338% games−10.2% vs expected
Jodi Kendall + Candi McMorran2446% gamesnot enough data
Jodi Kendall + Barbara Halliburton4151% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Courtney Neville
9W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Angie Ware
19W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
Janet Grillis
6W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Crista Mcmorran
19W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.79
PENNY WILKINS
10W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Angie Moore
13W–34L career · 4 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.61
Jodi Kendall
14W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
2.57
3
Brenda Kinney
15W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
40%60%<1%
2.54
Jacqueline Smith
9W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
0%76%24%
2.40
Kate Linebarger
2W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
77%23%<1%
2.40
3
Barbara Halliburton
13W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
83%17%<1%
2.37
3
Candi McMorran
13W–36L career · 2 lines in 2026
83%17%<1%
2.37

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.