Teams

Team 14

2022 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-04-28vs Team 10 Net NutsLost 01
L#2 DoublesJulian Myers Benton / Cheryl Danner vs Kristen Schopp / Lorraine Tacinelli6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2022-04-22Won 10
W#1 DoublesCathy Huh / Kimberly Mielcarek vs Jang Han / Jill Janecek6-3, 4-3
2022-04-20vs Team 3 Sassy SmashersWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulian Myers Benton / Cheryl Danner vs Josephine Cooper / Errin Matechak4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-04-03vs Team 12 Net StalkersLost 01
L#1 DoublesCathy Huh / Kimberly Mielcarek vs Alice Edmondson / Rachel Fritz6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-03-30vs Team 7Won 10
W#1 DoublesCheryl Danner / Julian Myers Benton vs PAULA SMITH / Tynika Wilson4-6, 6-3
2022-03-11vs Team 3 Sassy SmashersWon 10
W#1 SinglesCathy Huh vs Irena Bucci6-2, 5-0
2022-03-02vs Team 2Lost 01
L#1 SinglesCathy Huh vs Susan Thompson2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Charles Tellis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.77
Christine Ferry
published 4
3.72
Cathy Huh
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.58
Julian Myers Benton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.51
Noriko Hoffman
published 4
3.38
Cheryl Danner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julian Myers Benton + Cheryl Danner61246% games−7.0% vs expected
Noriko Hoffman + Cathy Huh6651% gamesnot enough data
Christine Ferry + Cathy Huh303 matchesnot enough data
Cheryl Danner + Noriko Hoffman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Charles Tellis
92W–54L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
4.22
4
Christine Ferry
38W–22L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Cathy Huh
208W–128L career · 4 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Julian Myers Benton
87W–85L career · 3 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
4
Noriko Hoffman
21W–31L career · no lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.51
3.5
Cheryl Danner
137W–193L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.