Teams

Moisson/Rogers/PCC

2026 Adult 55 & Over Spring 1 League · 3.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.40 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-25vs Hardgraves/Fayetteville/FACWon 21
L#1 DoublesMartin Brooks / Steven Lane vs Brent Jimenez / Sean Mahoney0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJames Moisson / Tarun Banerjee vs Terry Dahms / Trey Hollis3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDarius Chronister / Robert Faurot vs Marty Baker / David Humphrey6-2, 6-4
2026-04-25vs Costley/Bella Vista/KTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesRobert Faurot / Thor Larsen vs William Elshoff / Paul Hurley6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTarun Banerjee / James Moisson vs Richard Branam / Robert Droke4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDarius Chronister / Martin Brooks vs Jason Cantey / James Carr5-7, 2-6
2026-04-18vs Hardgraves/Fayetteville/FACLost 12
W#1 DoublesThor Larsen / Tarun Banerjee vs David Humphrey / David Moore6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJames Moisson / Robert Faurot vs Lance Court / Clifton Sherrer1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMartin Brooks / Brian McRae vs Johnny Smith / Marty Baker1-6, 2-6
2026-04-18vs Greer/Rogers/SVCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesJames Moisson / Tarun Banerjee vs Mike Cicatiello / Steven Hinkebein6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSteven Lane / Brian McRae vs Rickard Hood / Nicholaa Colucci5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesThor Larsen / Robert Faurot vs Scott Letts / David Vaughn6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2026-04-11vs Johnson-Hickman/Springdale/SRCWon 30
W#1 DoublesTarun Banerjee / James Moisson vs Donald Baird / Steve Finney7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesThor Larsen / Robert Faurot vs Spencer Scarbrough / Brad Beach3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMartin Brooks / Steven Lane vs Paul Hickman / John Harris6-4, 6-4
2026-04-07vs Costley/Bella Vista/KTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesTodd Hanus / Brian McRae vs Richard Branam / Robert Droke3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJames Moisson / Andrew Fano vs Andy Watkins / Jason Cantey4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMartin Brooks / Tarun Banerjee vs David Taylor / James Carr2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-03-03vs Greer/Rogers/SVCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesThor Larsen / Tarun Banerjee vs Rickard Hood / Joe Treece4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrian McRae / Darius Chronister vs Clay Fecht / Mike Cicatiello6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRobert Faurot / Steven Adair vs Douglas Raymond / Steven Hinkebein6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-02-20vs Johnson-Hickman/Springdale/SRCWon 21
L#1 DoublesAndrew Fano / Steven Adair vs Donald Baird / Mitchell Johnson1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesThor Larsen / Tarun Banerjee vs Ronald Chioldi / Paul Hickman7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDarius Chronister / Robert Faurot vs Spencer Scarbrough / Joseph Nelson7-5, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hardgraves/Fayetteville/FAC7118615159
2Costley/Bella Vista/KTC6218617203
3Moisson/Rogers/PCC53141027239
4Johnson-Hickman/Springdale/SRC2671738265
5Greer/Rogers/SVCC0832142277

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Tarun Banerjee
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.32
Darius Chronister
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
Martin Brooks
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Chris Brooks
published 3.5
3.14
James Moisson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Robert Faurot
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.09
Thor Larsen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.09
Brian McRae
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.09
Steven Lane
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.03
Andrew Fano
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.01
Steven Adair
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.77
Todd Hanus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Brendan Glass
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tarun Banerjee + James Moisson5351% games−0.4% vs expected
Tarun Banerjee + Thor Larsen314 matchesnot enough data
Darius Chronister + Martin Brooks123 matchesnot enough data
Thor Larsen + Robert Faurot213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tarun Banerjee
14W–8L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
3.39
3.5
Darius Chronister
10W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Martin Brooks
6W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Chris Brooks
3W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
James Moisson
6W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
Robert Faurot
8W–5L career · 7 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.13
Thor Larsen
8W–14L career · 6 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Brian McRae
3W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.09
Steven Lane
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.09
3.5
Andrew Fano
4W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.03
Steven Adair
11W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
3.01
Todd Hanus
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%5%
2.77
3
Brendan Glass
1W–15L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.