Teams

Suntree - Honaker

2026 Brevard Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.90 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-12vs Viera Regional Park - RamdehollLost 03
L#1 DoublesKyle McIntosh / John Sheppard vs Robert Dini / Rohan Ramdeholl2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJoseph Malatino / Dan Honaker vs Cameron Hartnett / Alec Nguyen3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDominick Nitti / Anthony Kalman vs James Hartnett / Joel Hopkins1-6, 2-6
2026-08-05vs Kiwi - HertzogLost 12
W#1 DoublesChad Shoultz / Kyle McIntosh vs Chad McCall / Ron Dulay6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesWilliam Honaker / Ryan Wilkins vs Benjamin Smith / Tony Famiano6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDan Honaker / Joseph Malatino vs Ron Gilroy / David Norris5-7, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Robert Sedaros
published
3.80
David Carver
published 4
3.75
William Honaker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Kyle McIntosh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Joseph Malatino
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.49
Dan Honaker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.44
Anthony Kalman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.42
Chad Shoultz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Matt Thurner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.17
John Sheppard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Ryan Wilkins
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.83
Dominick Nitti
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chad Shoultz + Matt Thurner4251% games+0.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robert Sedaros
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.87
4
David Carver
4W–4L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.80
4
William Honaker
66W–37L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.75
Kyle McIntosh
6W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.66
Joseph Malatino
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
3.51
4
Dan Honaker
2W–8L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
3.49
4
Anthony Kalman
5W–14L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
65%35%<1%
3.44
3.5
Chad Shoultz
15W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.42
Matt Thurner
12W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
3.26
John Sheppard
10W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.17
Ryan Wilkins
14W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
2.85
Dominick Nitti
10W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.