Teams

Sarasota/deBoer

2026 Sarasota Adult 65 & Over ESL Fall Women · 7.0 W Monday

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_5

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-12-08vs University Park UndauntedWon 21
W#1 DoublesJane Hurman / Anne McIntosh vs Jodi Joerres / Cecile Wooster6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLinda Sleet / Nancy Dickson vs Betsy Nelson / Terry Williamson6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBarbara Babb / Trish Connolly vs Lisa Vieira / Nini Torres1-6, 4-6
2025-11-24vs LWR Varsity GirlsWon 30
W#1 DoublesJane Hurman / Laura Walczak vs Kathleen Torrell / Linda Frazier6-0, 7-6
W#2 DoublesNancy Dickson / Linda Sleet vs Maureen Meaney / Jamie Reagan6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMarylynn Miles / Alaine Troisi vs Cheryl Johnson / Carole Majewski6-4, 6-3
2025-11-17vs Meadows Pink YaYasLost 03
L#1 DoublesLinda Sleet / Trish Connolly vs Alice Levine / Donna Spielberger2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMarylynn Miles / Alaine Troisi vs Linda Hosmer / Cindy Morris2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesGretchen de Boer / Jill Sneider vs Terri Costa / Karen Matthews2-6, 4-6
2025-11-03vs Payne Park HallWon 30
W#1 DoublesBarbara Babb / Laura Walczak vs Janet Hepner / Linda Kretlow6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesTrish Connolly / Linda Sleet vs Beverly Austgen / Catherine Hawkins6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesNancy Dickson / Marylynn Miles vs Jill Bressler / Marianne Zentz6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-10-27vs Payne Park Lacroix 65Won 21
W#1 DoublesJane Hurman / Anne McIntosh vs Judy Pittz / Joanne Wuelfing6-0, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMae Rose / Alaine Troisi vs Kathleen Henn / Rita Battaglia5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesGretchen de Boer / Jill Sneider vs Tammy Hallam / Teri Arrington7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-10-20vs Courtside PymWon 30
W#1 DoublesJane Hurman / Laura Walczak vs Thi Nguyen / Nancy Smith6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTrish Connolly / Linda Sleet vs Dale Cole / Brenda Mike6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBarbara Babb / Mae Rose vs Suzanne Brosnan / Sally Pym4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-10-13vs University Park UndauntedLost 12
W#1 DoublesJane Hurman / Anne McIntosh vs Cecile Wooster / Nini Torres6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesNancy Dickson / Mae Rose vs Betsy Nelson / Ursula Ruckli1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesGretchen de Boer / Jill Sneider vs Terry Williamson / Julia Sauer6-1, 1-6, 0-1
2025-10-06vs LWR Varsity GirlsWon 21
L#1 DoublesNancy Dickson / Linda Sleet vs Lisa Ceccacci / Kathleen Torrell6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMae Rose / Barbara Babb vs Loel Davenport / Leona Harris6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJane Hurman / Gretchen de Boer vs Cheryl Johnson / Ann Schlicht6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 W Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Jane Hurman
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.33
Barbara Babb
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Anne McIntosh
published 3.5
3.09
Alaine Troisi
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Gretchen de Boer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jill Sneider
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Laura Walczak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Linda Sleet
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Mae Rose
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Marylynn Miles
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Nancy Dickson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Trish Connolly
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mae Rose + Alaine Troisi161256% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Dickson + Mae Rose2443% gamesnot enough data
Gretchen de Boer + Jill Sneider1438% gamesnot enough data
Linda Sleet + Trish Connolly3254% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Dickson + Barbara Babb123 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Dickson + Alaine Troisi303 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Dickson + Linda Sleet213 matchesnot enough data
Mae Rose + Barbara Babb213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jane Hurman
11W–1L career · 6 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.64
3.5
Barbara Babb
9W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Anne McIntosh
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Alaine Troisi
46W–42L career · 3 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.09
Gretchen de Boer
4W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jill Sneider
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Laura Walczak
7W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Linda Sleet
6W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mae Rose
88W–62L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marylynn Miles
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nancy Dickson
55W–59L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Trish Connolly
4W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.