Teams

LTFC BLUE

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.94 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-18vs SSH GREENLost 04
L#1 DoublesAshley Gonzales / Brandi Renick-Smith vs Mia Settlemire / Linda Bartels3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesVenita Vereen vs Jennifer Armstrong6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesClare Ambrose / Courtney Ring vs Sesha Carbonaro / Adriana Vernon3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBeth Zubowicz / Tracy Bourque vs Jill Spehalski / Marty Smith1-6, 0-6
2022-07-11vs HW REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesAshley Agrelius / Venita Vereen vs Susan Stroeher / Tina Parks5-7, 6-7
W#1 SinglesBeth Zubowicz vs Roberta Nicknish2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrandi Renick-Smith / Ashley Gonzales vs Kathy Norford / Kathleen Goldy6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesClare Ambrose / Nancy Brooks vs Stacy Ford / Brittany Loui1-6, 5-7
2022-07-07vs WC NAVYWon 31
W#1 DoublesAshley Agrelius / Brandi Renick-Smith vs Jamelle Leyden / Stacy Burd2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesVenita Vereen vs Margaret Wilson6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDori Yaworski / Ashley Gonzales vs Robin Carroll / Kate Mayoss1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCourtney Ring / Tracy Bourque vs Andrea Milanovich / Dawn Bergin6-2, 6-4
2022-07-04vs HFII GREENLost 04
L#1 DoublesHeidi Elliott / Beth Zubowicz vs Julie Garside / Paige Jones6-7, 5-7
L#1 SinglesVenita Vereen vs Sandra Stephenson1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAshley Agrelius / Nancy Brooks vs Kristi Piazza / Diane Vartuli3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesTracy Bourque / Dori Yaworski vs Joy Coulter-Brown / Juliana Daugherty5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2022-06-28vs GCC REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesAshley Agrelius / Clare Ambrose vs Jami Hawkins / Shannon Johnson3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesVenita Vereen vs Jamie Harris6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNancy Brooks / Ashley Gonzales vs Kris McMullan / Betsy Phillips6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBrandi Renick-Smith / Tracy Bourque vs Keli Loehr / Heidi Wolfe2-6, 2-6
2022-06-20vs GAC REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesHeidi Elliott / Beth Zubowicz vs Tanya Maierhofer / Suzanne Martinek7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesVenita Vereen vs Lillian Marsh6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNancy Brooks / Ashley Agrelius vs Monica Hustead / Gloria Matthews6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCourtney Ring / Tracy Bourque vs Cynthia Wessinger / Linda Smith6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2022-06-06vs PRC TEALWon 31
L#1 DoublesHeidi Elliott / Beth Zubowicz vs Brenda Amundsen / Denise Dickson3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesVenita Vereen vs Tracy Monismith6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAshley Agrelius / Ashley Gonzales vs Seanna Mulligan / Elizabeth Anderson6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCourtney Ring / Clare Ambrose vs Krissy Hanna / Heidi Pennink6-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Venita Vereen
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
3.75
Ashley Gonzales
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.74
Courtney Ring
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.69
Dori Yaworski
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.62
Brandi Renick-Smith
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.58
Nancy Brooks
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.51
Clare Ambrose
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.50
Beth Zubowicz
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.49
Tracy Bourque
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.49
Heidi Elliott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Ashley Agrelius
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracy Bourque + Ashley Gonzales5353% games+6.9% vs expected
Tracy Bourque + Brandi Renick-Smith7257% games+5.5% vs expected
Nancy Brooks + Ashley Agrelius3251% games+3.3% vs expected
Heidi Elliott + Beth Zubowicz201951% games+3.1% vs expected
Dori Yaworski + Ashley Gonzales282750% games+2.2% vs expected
Brandi Renick-Smith + Ashley Gonzales4846% games−1.1% vs expected
Tracy Bourque + Courtney Ring3349% games−1.4% vs expected
Nancy Brooks + Dori Yaworski1646% games−2.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Venita Vereen
50W–37L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Ashley Gonzales
82W–68L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Courtney Ring
70W–77L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Dori Yaworski
72W–76L career · 2 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Brandi Renick-Smith
52W–73L career · 4 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.62
Nancy Brooks
44W–87L career · 4 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
4
Clare Ambrose
49W–71L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
3.51
4
Beth Zubowicz
53W–52L career · 5 lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
3.50
4
Tracy Bourque
85W–126L career · type A · 5 lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
3.49
4
Heidi Elliott
57W–70L career · 3 lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
3.49
3.5
Ashley Agrelius
92W–138L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
3.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.