Teams

LSHayes - River Run

2022 Lake Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Women 5.5 Thursday

11 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-10-13Won 20
W#1 DoublesKendrick Anderson / Elise Wehrum vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSue Hayes / Julie Lyerly vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-10-06vs LWMizicko/JettonWon 10
W#1 DoublesElise Wehrum / Sue Hayes vs Natalie Bell / Kathleen Galloway6-2, 6-3
2022-09-29vs LSHarris/Monacell/JettonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJulie Lyerly / Kendrick Anderson vs Kim Kelly Senff / Amy Strickland6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesElise Wehrum / Kathryn Love vs Danielle Mikolajczyk / Joy Evans4-6, 1-6
2022-09-15vs LMAdinolfi/The FarmsWon 10
W#2 DoublesSue Hayes / Julie Lyerly vs Shawna Knutson / Lauren Marchese6-3, 7-6
2022-09-08Split 11
W#1 DoublesRuthie Naylor / Elise Wehrum vs Lauran Sites / Jeannie Coyer6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJulie Lyerly / Kathryn Love vs Libby McCraw / Kelly Wilson6-7, 6-7
2022-08-18vs LJGerminario/EdgemoorWon 20
W#1 DoublesKendrick Anderson / Julie Lyerly vs Kelly Camuti / Jenna Germinario6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesElise Wehrum / Kathryn Love vs Brenda Zino / Katy Clatterbaugh6-2, 6-2
2022-08-11vs LMAdinolfi/The FarmsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesElise Wehrum / Amy Reaves vs Erika Schapiro / Lauren Marchese6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesRuthie Naylor / Julie Lyerly vs Abby Richardson / Nancy Bessler6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 5.5 Thursday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Kendrick Anderson
published
3.30
Julie Lyerly
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Amy Reaves
published 3.5
3.14
2.90
Courtney Seiter
published 3
Elizabeth Breen
published 3
2.66
Elise Wehrum
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.43
Ruthie Naylor
published
Karen Holleman
published
Kathryn Love
published
Sue Hayes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Lyerly + Elise Wehrum4840% games+2.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kendrick Anderson
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Julie Lyerly
82W–86L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Amy Reaves
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Jennifer Papageorgiou
14W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%13%87%
3.14
3
Courtney Seiter
9W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Elizabeth Breen
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Elise Wehrum
28W–24L career · 6 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.66
Ruthie Naylor
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
70%30%<1%
2.43
Karen Holleman
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathryn Love
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sue Hayes
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.