Teams

CSRC BRENNER

2025 CTA TWILIGHT - SOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT - SOCO

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-09-03vs CCOC KNORRLost 03
L#1 DoublesShawnee Brenner / Denielle Backstrom vs Jillian Ringer / Kelly Sung2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesSarah Yankowski vs Michelle Erlander0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKristina Kyle / Katelyn Kyle vs Jan Hyman / Irene Larimer0-6, 5-7
2025-08-25vs MEMPK CAMPBELLLost 12
W#1 DoublesDenielle Backstrom / Karen Newton vs Andrea Murray / Jamie Horspool1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKristina Kyle vs Tricia Campbell3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKatelyn Kyle / Sarah Yankowski vs Tiffany Freel / Julie Wiswell6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-08-04vs BRDMR EASTMANSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKristina Kyle / Katelyn Kyle vs Paula Lipes / Annette Eastman5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesShawnee Brenner / Denielle Backstrom vs Christie Lee / Ginger Mentz6-1, 6-0
2025-07-28vs CCOC KNORRLost 03
L#1 DoublesShawnee Brenner / Denielle Backstrom vs Barbara Jean Knorr / Nina Ballenger4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKristina Kyle vs Michelle Erlander0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Newton / Katelyn Kyle vs Kelly Sung / Cody Ross1-6, 0-6
2025-07-21vs MEMPK CAMPBELLWon 30
W#1 DoublesKaren Newton / Kristina Kyle vs Tiffany Freel / Andrea Murray7-6, 7-5
W#1 SinglesSarah Yankowski vs Emma Patterson6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesShawnee Brenner / Denielle Backstrom vs Tricia Campbell / Jennifer Tanner6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Denielle Backstrom
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.90
Shawnee Brenner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.78
Kristina Kyle
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.75
Karen Newton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.66
Sarah Yankowski
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.58
Katelyn Kyle
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Newton + Kristina Kyle12456% games+6.5% vs expected
Denielle Backstrom + Shawnee Brenner9364% games+3.1% vs expected
Karen Newton + Denielle Backstrom404 matchesnot enough data
Katelyn Kyle + Kristina Kyle033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Denielle Backstrom
24W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.19
Shawnee Brenner
31W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
Kristina Kyle
24W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
2.78
Karen Newton
24W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Sarah Yankowski
9W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
Katelyn Kyle
1W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
2.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.