Teams

SGV Smashing Dragons - Francisco- Scholl Canyon/SA9

2021 SoCal Doubles 18 & Over - San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#2 DoublesVannia de la Cuba / Jacqueline Bobo vs Rebecca Escandon / Amy Hasquet0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPilar Pena / Wangie Pineda vs Rebecca Roman-Gonzalez / Arisa Ueno1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJacqueline Bobo / Deborah Kerr-Orlik vs Carrie Gasper / Carmen Martinez0-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Bobo / Lydia Olivier vs Alison Latiolait / Katie Tong1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPatricia Francisco / Kathleen Foy-Asaro vs Ann Messana / Dianne Ciulla1-6, 2-6
2021-10-09vs SGV Dynamic Duos -Chow-WN/SU10Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMindy Schiffman / Andrea Hutchman vs Alisa MacKey / Krislea Manuva1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Hall / Kathleen Foy-Asaro vs Cindi Carter / Kristin McQueen3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMindy Schiffman / Andrea Hutchman vs Danielle Perrigue / Sandra Manion0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLydia Olivier / Wangie Pineda vs Aydee Martinez / Cris Stark2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Nicole Winslow
published 4
3.29
Mindy Schiffman
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.26
Kathleen Foy-Asaro
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Wangie Pineda
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Andrea Hutchman
published 3.5
2.99
Deborah Kerr-Orlik
published 3.5
2.74
Sharon Spangler
published
2.72
Jacqueline Bobo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.50
Patricia Francisco
published
Loretta Peng
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicole Winslow + Mindy Schiffman224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Nicole Winslow
44W–62L career · no lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Mindy Schiffman
84W–100L career · 7 lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Kathleen Foy-Asaro
172W–163L career · 2 lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Wangie Pineda
96W–110L career · 2 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.22
3.5
Andrea Hutchman
3W–14L career · no lines in 2021
40%60%<1%
3.03
3.5
Deborah Kerr-Orlik
57W–134L career · type A · no lines in 2021
54%46%<1%
2.99
Sharon Spangler
8W–16L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Jacqueline Bobo
30W–50L career · 4 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.72
Patricia Francisco
8W–9L career · no lines in 2021
50%50%<1%
2.50
Loretta Peng
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.