Teams

MP:Lobstoppers:Robinson

2021 ME Adult 18 & Over Women · 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-05-22Won 10
W#2 DoublesErin James / Janice Robinson vs Lori Lavoie / Sara Kovacs7-5, 6-2
2021-05-22vs MRC:WreckingBalls:RoperLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichelle Keleher / Sofia Trogu vs Jennifer Roper / Erica Gates7-5, 6-3
L#1 SinglesKarin Tuuri vs Jenn Messier4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesElaine Bell / Janice Robinson vs Elizabeth Moss / Katie Urey4-6, 2-6
2021-05-02vs WOOD:TheWoodlands:LacombeSplit 11
L#1 SinglesErin James vs Whitney Wignall0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJanice Robinson / Vicky Packard vs Melissa And LaCasse / Donyelle Werner3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-05-02Won 30
W#1 DoublesCelinda Shannon / Karin Tuuri vs Sara Kovacs / Amy Link4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesElaine Bell vs Alexandra Barr6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesErin James / Vicky Packard vs Heather Shields / Holly Wright6-1, 6-1
2021-04-11vs WOOD:TheWoodlands:LacombeLost 02
L#1 DoublesKarin Tuuri / Elaine Bell vs Kimberly Oconnell / Linda Rathbun2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJanice Robinson / Mia Jones vs TAMMY GARLAND / Sally Roper3-6, 2-6
2021-04-11vs MRC:WreckingBalls:RoperLost 03
L#1 DoublesKarin Tuuri / Michelle Keleher vs Kimberly Nicolet / Jennifer Roper2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesVicky Packard vs Jenn Messier1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesElaine Bell / Celinda Shannon vs Erica Gates / Elizabeth Moss2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MRC:WreckingBalls:Roper4211715136
2MP:Lobstoppers:Robinson2471124175
3RFC:SliceGirls:Lavoie0621632196

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Elaine Bell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Erin James
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
Janice Robinson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Karin Tuuri
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Michelle Keleher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tess Chakkalakal
published
Vicky Packard
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vicky Packard + Janice Robinson2442% games−4.3% vs expected
Elaine Bell + Janice Robinson0627% gamesnot enough data
Elaine Bell + Karin Tuuri134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Elaine Bell
14W–32L career · type A · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Erin James
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Janice Robinson
26W–53L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Karin Tuuri
7W–8L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Michelle Keleher
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Tess Chakkalakal
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Vicky Packard
10W–18L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.