Teams

KY/LEX/Jenkins

2025 USTA LEAGUE 40 & Over ADULT LEXINGTON · Women 4.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-02-26vs KY/LEX/MolinaLost 23
L#1 DoublesCarmen Amato / Elizabeth Montgomery vs Lori Brunner / Katerina Molina4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesWendy Kogler vs Lee Ann Jung6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNancy Bailey / Kavonne B. Webb vs Melinda Shofner / Whitney Byard6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKristen Tewell / Leslie Simpson vs Julie Carlisle / Melinda McClain6-0, 7-5
L#4 DoublesJeannie Guskey / Lori Tenney vs Kirsten van Haaren / Doris Senters2-6, 2-6
2025-02-24vs KY/LEX/Parrish MorrowLost 04
L#1 DoublesKavonne B. Webb / Elizabeth Montgomery vs Lily Le / Jill Leckner2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMarika Wesolosky / Dorothy Meng vs Camille Morrow / Katie Parrish4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Bailey / Jeannie Guskey vs Jordan Reeves / Erin Azbell3-6, 0-6
L#4 DoublesVicki van Winkle / Wendy Kogler vs Teela Watts / Erin Brester7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2025-01-21vs KY/LEX/MolinaLost 23
L#1 DoublesNicole Norfleet / Nancy Bailey vs Cindy Bramble / Lori Brunner3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKavonne B. Webb vs Hiroko Nakata3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCarmen Amato / Elizabeth Montgomery vs Billie Walters / Julie Carlisle6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJanine Coy / Leslie Simpson vs Cristi Hundley / Jennifer Wilson6-1, 7-5
L#4 DoublesLori Tenney / Vicki van Winkle vs Melinda Shofner / Sarah Knight2-6, 2-6
2025-01-19vs KY/LEX/Parrish MorrowLost 05
L#1 DoublesCarmen Amato / Nicole Norfleet vs Lily Le / Jill Leckner3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesWendy Kogler vs Julia Hollon6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Diggs / Kristen Tewell vs Lindsey Kretz / Grace McGonigle3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJeannie Guskey / Janine Coy vs Camille Morrow / Katie Parrish3-6, 1-6
L#4 DoublesVicki van Winkle / Mary Ringle vs Erin Azbell / Jordan Reeves0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Elizabeth Montgomery
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.54
Carmen Amato
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.44
Nicole Norfleet
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.44
Kavonne B. Webb
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.39
Janine Coy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Karen Diggs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Kristen Tewell
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.29
Jeannie Guskey
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.25
Ann Denny
published 3.5
3.16
Nancy Bailey
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Dorothy Meng
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Leslie Simpson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lori Tenney
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Marika Wesolosky
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Ringle
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Vicki van Winkle
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Wendy Kogler
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janine Coy + Kristen Tewell8260% games+10.6% vs expected
Elizabeth Montgomery + Nancy Bailey3256% games+8.5% vs expected
Elizabeth Montgomery + Carmen Amato7163% games+4.0% vs expected
Elizabeth Montgomery + Kavonne B. Webb2345% games−4.2% vs expected
Nancy Bailey + Carmen Amato2341% games−4.6% vs expected
Kavonne B. Webb + Nancy Bailey044 matchesnot enough data
Ann Denny + Kavonne B. Webb303 matchesnot enough data
Kavonne B. Webb + Carmen Amato303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Montgomery
24W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.75
3.5
Carmen Amato
37W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.54
Nicole Norfleet
7W–28L career · 5 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
3.44
Kavonne B. Webb
16W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
Janine Coy
64W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%22%
3.39
Karen Diggs
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Kristen Tewell
20W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Jeannie Guskey
11W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Ann Denny
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Nancy Bailey
16W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Dorothy Meng
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Leslie Simpson
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lori Tenney
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marika Wesolosky
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mary Ringle
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Vicki van Winkle
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Wendy Kogler
2W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.