Teams

SHC-Lamb

2019 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Men

4 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Thomas MacDonald
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
Monte Gonzales
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.62
Chuck Gray
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
LAWRENCE HIPSHMAN
published 0
Results7 ties
2018-11-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesMonte Gonzales / Thomas MacDonald vs Thomas Harvey / John Lynch6-3, 6-1
2018-11-04Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMonte Gonzales / Kevin Gooley vs Thomas Harvey / John Lynch6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2018-10-27Won 10
W#1 DoublesThomas MacDonald / Robert Harvey vs Andrew Craig / Chris Keefer1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2018-10-20Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMonte Gonzales / Robert Harvey vs Jeremy Geschwind / Michael McTague2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2018-10-07Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMonte Gonzales / James Zupancic vs Keith Westrum / Frank Brown6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesChuck Gray / Jack Wilborn vs Robert Adatto / James Lawrence6-1, 6-1
2018-09-15Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMonte Gonzales / Matt Modrcin vs Arvid Anderson / Don Pearson6-2, 6-2
2018-09-14Split 11
W#1 DoublesMonte Gonzales / Robert Harvey vs Thomas Pak / Francis Bletko6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesChuck Gray / Kevin Gooley vs Wes Milligan / Robert Adatto6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Thomas MacDonald
54W–33L career
0%59%41%
3.08
3
Monte Gonzales
118W–98L career
0%96%4%
2.90
3
Chuck Gray
4W–12L career · type S
19%80%1%
2.62
0
LAWRENCE HIPSHMAN
2W–15L career
not enough data

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.