Teams

Blue Point, Tang

2021 40&Over Mixed · 7.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.78 / LONG ISLAND REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-05-16vs Syosset, SchosbergLost 03
L#1 DoublesTommy Gulbransen / Marilyn Sloan vs Jeff Kee / Jaeeun Lee1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Reid / Darlene Dempsey vs Jung Park / Catherine Wang3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSteve Subject / Elizabeth Anderson vs Carlos Rios / Dawn Schosberg4-6, 6-7
2021-05-02vs LI: Point Set, Sarnelli/ThomasLost 12
L#1 DoublesSteve Subject / Heidi Cifelli vs Patricia Siler / Tom Hennig2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLily Tang / Ronald Teller vs Christine Wiss / Scott Wiss4-6, 5-6
W#3 DoublesDarlene Dempsey / David Reid vs Nancy Rosenthal / Stan Yurynets7-5, 6-4
2021-04-16vs Deer Park, Patel & BuntingLost 12
L#1 DoublesAndrew Wasileski / Christine Tyson vs Kevin Bunting / Juliette Lowery3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesZsuzsa Price / Tommy Gulbransen vs Kara Parker / Anthony LaRocca4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDavid Reid / Darlene Dempsey vs Scott Eifert / Suzanne Ciserano6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2021-03-26vs Syosset, GarfieldLost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Reid / Darlene Dempsey vs Nancy Prince / David Rafiy3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRaymond Abady / Elizabeth Anderson vs Chris Garfield / Kimberly Gershon2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLily Tang / Frank Colletti vs Alexandria Capra / Ray Omid1-6, 3-6
2021-03-14vs Lynbrook, HealyLost 12
L#1 DoublesAndrew Wasileski / Christine Tyson vs Dennis Dawkins / Valsey Bartley6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRonald Teller / Lily Tang vs Jeffrey Lacy / Jinny Welch2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTommy Gulbransen / Zsuzsa Price vs Karson Volcy / Donna Healy6-0, 6-2
2021-02-21vs Lynbrook, BlueLost 12
W#1 DoublesLily Tang / Ronald Teller vs Shanon Blue / Peter Hsieh6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesZsuzsa Price / Frank Colletti vs Andy Funk / Ruth Settles0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSusie Kaiserman / David Reid vs Mindy Reed / Shaun Willis4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Christine Tyson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Tommy Gulbransen
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
David Reid
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Evangeline Boutin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Henry Winnicki
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.40
Heidi Cifelli
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.39
Zsuzsa Price
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Marilyn Sloan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Elizabeth Anderson
published 3.5
3.21
Lily Tang
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
Steve Subject
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.19
John Guidone
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Andrew Wasileski
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Anthony Leggio
published
Darlene Dempsey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Frank Colletti
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Raymond Abady
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Ronald Teller
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Susie Kaiserman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Reid + Evangeline Boutin134 matchesnot enough data
Lily Tang + Ronald Teller224 matchesnot enough data
John Guidone + Elizabeth Anderson123 matchesnot enough data
Anthony Leggio + Lily Tang033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christine Tyson
162W–97L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Tommy Gulbransen
95W–58L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
4
David Reid
17W–29L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Evangeline Boutin
21W–19L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Henry Winnicki
62W–50L career · 1 line in 2021
3%94%2%
3.74
3.5
Heidi Cifelli
86W–84L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Zsuzsa Price
213W–159L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%80%20%
3.39
Marilyn Sloan
42W–44L career · 1 line in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Elizabeth Anderson
18W–39L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Lily Tang
87W–72L career · 6 lines in 2021
99%1%<1%
3.21
3.5
Steve Subject
64W–149L career · 4 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
John Guidone
28W–32L career · 1 line in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
Andrew Wasileski
15W–15L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Anthony Leggio
22W–22L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Darlene Dempsey
5W–3L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Frank Colletti
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Raymond Abady
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Ronald Teller
2W–2L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Susie Kaiserman
12W–16L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.