Teams

Manor 3.5

2022 Montgomery Adult Other Women's Day Winter · Montgomery Adult Other Women's Day Winter 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.60 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-02-28vs HjelleWon 10
W#1 DoublesSherifa Fahmy / Marijane Forde vs Julie McConnell / Linda Ginsburg6-0, 6-0
2022-02-25vs Match MakersWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaura MECHAK / Marijane Forde vs Bettina Lynn / Martha Fleury6-1, 6-4
2022-01-27Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMaureen Smith / Marijane Forde vs Kimberly Klimek / Elizabeth Levy2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult Other Women's Day Winter 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
3.48
Kelley Donellan
published
3.44
Melisssa Hacopian
published
3.32
Marijane Forde
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Diana DePaul
published 3.5
3.24
Amy Burgoyne
published 3.5
3.20
Maureen Smith
published
3.00
Cybelle Long
published 3.5
2.66
Tammy Griffin
published
Karen Dugan
published
Sherifa Fahmy
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cathy Ventrell-Monsees
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.64
Kelley Donellan
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
57%43%<1%
3.48
Melisssa Hacopian
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
69%31%<1%
3.44
3.5
Marijane Forde
36W–43L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Diana DePaul
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Amy Burgoyne
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
Maureen Smith
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Cybelle Long
1W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
3.00
Tammy Griffin
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
2.66
Karen Dugan
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sherifa Fahmy
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.