Teams

Gilreath

2022 Capital Summer 18 & Over Singles League · 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-08-01Lost 03
L#1 SinglesRossi Evans vs Rebecca Edwards1-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesBeth Pegram vs Megan Burke1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesEmily Andino vs Elizabeth Fassler3-6, 0-6
2022-07-18vs JKaulbackLost 01
L#1 SinglesRossi Evans vs Jennifer Kaulback2-6, 2-6
2022-07-11vs MLHastySplit 11
W#1 SinglesBrandi Washington vs Miriam Waters7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesBeth Pegram vs Cooper Thornhill4-6, 1-6
2022-07-04vs MParisSplit 11
W#1 SinglesRossi Evans vs Kristen Patch6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesEmily Andino vs Gail Scoggin2-6, 1-6
2022-06-30Won 10
W#1 SinglesBrandi Washington vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-20vs NSchweitzerLost 02
L#1 SinglesRossi Evans vs Emily Slater1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesEmily Andino vs Caroline Beaird1-6, 1-6
2022-06-13vs MLagerstedtLost 12
L#1 SinglesBeth Pegram vs Jennifer Sigler0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesBrandi Washington vs Lauren Lelewski4-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesRossi Evans vs Laura Wingo6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Rossi Evans
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 3
3.02
Beth Pegram
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
Erika Martin
published 3
2.71
Kristi Gilreath
published
2.40
Lisa Pakela
published
2.35
Brandi Washington
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 2.5
2.28
Emily Andino
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rossi Evans + Beth Pegram3356% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Rossi Evans
142W–87L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Beth Pegram
77W–59L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Erika Martin
0W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kristi Gilreath
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
2.71
Lisa Pakela
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
0%77%23%
2.40
2.5
Brandi Washington
63W–111L career · 5 lines in 2022
0%88%12%
2.35
2.5
Emily Andino
36W–49L career · 3 lines in 2022
0%96%4%
2.28

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.