Teams

Hanbury (Founders Park)

2023 Miami-Dade TriLevel 18 & Over - Spring · 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.40 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#3 DoublesKristi Couture / Shirley Wilson vs Jessica Blackie / Elizabeth Angelone3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesShirley Wilson / Kristi Couture vs Sindee Furshman / Elizabeth Angelone5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2023-02-14vs Horowitz (Key Largo Park)Won 10
W#3 DoublesMichelle Walker / Kristi Couture vs Diana Dardio / Stephanie Murtagh6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKristi Couture / Michelle Walker vs Sindee Furshman / Elizabeth Angelone6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2023-01-24vs Horowitz (Key Largo Park)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesEllen Dalton / Kristi Couture vs Stephanie Murtagh / Melanie Horowitz1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Margaret MacHoian
published
3.60
Kristin Rosendale
published
3.53
Margot Hanbury
published
3.46
Elizabeth Baxter
published 3.5
3.40
Shirley Wilson
published
3.35
Kristi Couture
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Beth Clark
published 3.5
3.14
Linsey Ekblom
published
3.13
Ellen Dalton
published 3.5
2.88
Colleen Mulryne
published 3
2.82
Merle Villanueva
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin Rosendale + Colleen Mulryne11560% games+6.0% vs expected
Ellen Dalton + Shirley Wilson4653% games−2.4% vs expected
Ellen Dalton + Margot Hanbury213 matchesnot enough data
Margot Hanbury + Shirley Wilson213 matchesnot enough data
Shirley Wilson + Linsey Ekblom033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Margaret MacHoian
29W–20L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.75
Kristin Rosendale
19W–13L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.60
Margot Hanbury
21W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%42%58%
3.53
3.5
Elizabeth Baxter
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.46
Shirley Wilson
9W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Kristi Couture
79W–50L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Beth Clark
57W–68L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.34
Linsey Ekblom
2W–11L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Ellen Dalton
66W–33L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.13
3
Colleen Mulryne
22W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
2.88
Merle Villanueva
9W–14L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%9%
2.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.