Teams

FOUNTAINGROVE-AC 40AW4.0A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
W#1 DoublesGiannina Hawkes / Theresa Martinez vs Nancy Wong / Lisa Dierking6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKelly Grudzien / Inga Cantu vs Angela Merola / Amy Tompkins1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAna Dougherty / Yen Ngo vs Elaine Madson / Pam Myers5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 DoublesTheresa Martinez / Giannina Hawkes vs Ulu McBride / Amy Tompkins6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesInga Cantu / Kelly Grudzien vs Grace Zhang / Susan Collins2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMary Schwank / Nichelle Watkins vs Elaine Madson / Jennifer Westly2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Giannina Hawkes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.90
Geri Amaral
published 4
3.79
Yen Ngo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Ana Dougherty
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Theresa Martinez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Joni Chovick
published
3.65
Kim Valerga
published
3.59
Inga Cantu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Mary Schwank
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Kelly Grudzien
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Nicole Manville
published
3.43
Nichelle Watkins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
3.38
Judith Mattingly
published
Patricia Krickl
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Inga Cantu + Kelly Grudzien0534% gamesnot enough data
Theresa Martinez + Giannina Hawkes404 matchesnot enough data
Inga Cantu + Kim Valerga314 matchesnot enough data
Kim Valerga + Natalie Cosentino Manning224 matchesnot enough data
Kim Valerga + Nichelle Watkins134 matchesnot enough data
Geri Amaral + Theresa Martinez213 matchesnot enough data
Theresa Martinez + Ana Dougherty213 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Grudzien + Yen Ngo213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Giannina Hawkes
8W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
4.07
4
Geri Amaral
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
Yen Ngo
6W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Ana Dougherty
16W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%5%
3.78
Theresa Martinez
10W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.72
Joni Chovick
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
Kim Valerga
7W–12L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Inga Cantu
7W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.59
Mary Schwank
1W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.50
Kelly Grudzien
12W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
3.46
Nicole Manville
11W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.45
Nichelle Watkins
10W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
72%28%<1%
3.43
Natalie Cosentino Manning
3W–22L career · no lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
3.39
Judith Mattingly
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.38
Patricia Krickl
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.