Teams

Vogel/Wood/Nashville

2025 Adult 18 & Over - Nashville · 3.5 Women - TUE AM

15 players · average NTRP 3.25 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-02vs Brown/Rosenthal/NashvilleLost 01
L#3 DoublesSarah Vogel / Lacey Keally vs Suzy Simpson / Melissa Chadwick4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-03-26vs Lee/Frame/NashvilleSplit 11
W#2 SinglesLacey Keally vs Cassie Bourdon6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesStacey Wood / Morgan Hinkley vs Beth Frame / Joy Owens1-6, 4-6
2025-03-25vs Shalk/Villalta/NashvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesMorgan Hinkley / Sarah Vogel vs Courtney Hendry-Williams / Elizabeth Leo4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSarah Robbins vs Maria Schoonover4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLacey Keally / Stacey Wood vs Ginger Childs / Kelly Cole6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesCourtney Irving vs Patricia Villalta1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesVictoria Lubnik / Paige Patton vs Preeti Arla / Anne Budelier6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-03-18vs Frame/Brown/NashvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesAli Davis / Elinor Adams vs Cindy Chaffin / Julie LaLance0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesLacey Keally vs Tonia Porter4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Vogel / Morgan Hinkley vs Jacqueline Marshall / Beth Frame2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesSarah Robbins vs Cassie Bourdon1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesStacey Wood / Lindsey Murrell vs Autumn Brown / Joan Arney6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women - TUE AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Casey Parker
published 3.5
3.55
Lacey Keally
usually #1 Singles 25%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.44
Jessica Followill
published
3.35
Morgan Hinkley
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Sarah Robbins
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.27
Ali Davis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Elinor Adams
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Paige Patton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Lindsey Murrell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Victoria Lubnik
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Courtney Irving
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.87
Brooke Keane
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.87
Olivia Dial
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Julia Spickard
published
Molly Virgin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lacey Keally + Morgan Hinkley5753% games+11.6% vs expected
Paige Patton + Victoria Lubnik4150% gamesnot enough data
Ali Davis + Paige Patton134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Casey Parker
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.59
Lacey Keally
24W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.55
Jessica Followill
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
Morgan Hinkley
20W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.35
Sarah Robbins
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Ali Davis
10W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Elinor Adams
8W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Paige Patton
20W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Lindsey Murrell
9W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
Victoria Lubnik
17W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
3
Courtney Irving
9W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Brooke Keane
9W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%18%
2.87
Olivia Dial
15W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.87
Julia Spickard
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Molly Virgin
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.