Teams

SD 4.5M UCRC (3@11AM:2)/ Dang

2024 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD WE · SD - Men - 4.5

12 players · average NTRP 4.44 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesAndrew Tek / Daniel Pepa vs Ranjit Salvi / David Bracher6-2, 0-6, 0-1
2024-05-18vs SD LLW 4.5M Balboa TC / HwangLost 01
L#2 DoublesGregory Gerardo / David Wu vs Jeff Ferguson / Stuart Ridge1-6, 2-6
2024-05-12Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKellen Sabhlok / Gregory Gerardo vs John Simmons / Alex Whitmore6-2, 0-6, 0-1
2024-04-28vs SD 4.5M PBTC (3@Noon:2)/ MaurizWon 10
W#1 DoublesDaniel Pepa / Andrew Tek vs Jackson Kushner / Lucas Heilman6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-04-13Won 10
W#1 DoublesDaniel Pepa / Andrew Tek vs Michael Rath / Alex Whitmore6-2, 6-3
2024-04-07vs SD LLW 4.5M Balboa TC / HwangLost 01
L#1 DoublesDaniel Pepa / Andrew Tek vs Nicholas Nguyen / Lawrence Rand1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Men - 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.18 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Dan Schon
published 4.5
4.28
Andrew Tek
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.26
David Morton
published 4.5
4.25
Cody Lin
published 4.5
4.19
Daniel Pepa
published 4.5
4.19
Jacqueline Chafe
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 4.5
4.17
Deval Gupta
published 4.5
4.14
Vinh Dang
published
3.83
Gregory Gerardo
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
Kent Kerner
published
Tam Doan
published
Taylor Dimler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniel Pepa + Andrew Tek213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dan Schon
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%15%
4.36
4.5
Andrew Tek
34W–33L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
4.28
4.5
David Morton
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%4%
4.26
4.5
Cody Lin
20W–0L career · type D · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Daniel Pepa
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
4.19
4.5
Jacqueline Chafe
97W–71L career · 7 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
4.19
4.5
Deval Gupta
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
4.17
Vinh Dang
33W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%16%84%
4.14
4
Gregory Gerardo
41W–43L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.83
Kent Kerner
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tam Doan
2W–13L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Taylor Dimler
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.