Teams

Garnett/Memphis

2026 Tri-Level 18 & Over - Memphis · 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.40 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-14vs Brackett/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesKevin Roedel / Greg Thornbury vs Hector Custode / Caden LeBlanc2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDoug Wilson / Graham Heard vs John Mikl / Peyton Neal4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJustin Marek / Jesse Baker vs Ryan Coopwood / John Stukenborg0-6, 1-6
2026-06-30vs LaBonia/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesDavid Kam / Scott Martin vs Gabe LaBonia / Daniel Forbes7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDavid van Horn / Rob Dannemiller vs Mike Galdieri / Samuel LaBonia4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesGraham Heard / Hunter Mitchell vs James Cunningham / David Patterson6-1, 6-2
2026-06-23vs Kumpatla/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Kam / Scott Martin vs Darshan Sampat / Vidyasagar Velamala2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRob Dannemiller / Bret Sokoloff vs Chandra Sinha / RAYUDU KUMPATLA7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJustin Marek / Jesse Baker vs Aravind Nune / Ratna Manohar Burakayala0-6, 0-6
2026-06-16vs Brackett/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesRob Dannemiller / Bret Sokoloff vs Brandon Brackett / Peyton Neal1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDoug Wilson / Greg Thornbury vs Cashe Shows / Sharpe Smith1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesHunter Mitchell / Curt Goetsch vs Ryan Coopwood / John Manshack6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-06-09vs LaBonia/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesDavid Kam / Scott Martin vs Jeff Earnest / Ian Strelsin6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesDavid van Horn / Rob Dannemiller vs Gabe LaBonia / Samuel LaBonia5-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesDoug Wilson / Dan Huss vs Brice Bailey / David Patterson6-3, 6-3
2026-06-02vs Kumpatla/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesBret Sokoloff / Scott Martin vs Darshan Sampat / Vidyasagar Velamala5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDoug Wilson / Curt Goetsch vs RAYUDU KUMPATLA / Chandra Sinha2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesGraham Heard / Matt Gronostaj vs Ratna Manohar Burakayala / Aravind Nune4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
David Kam
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.44
Bret Sokoloff
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
Kevin Roedel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Greg Thornbury
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
David van Horn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Rob Dannemiller
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.13
Graham Heard
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Curt Goetsch
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.89
Dan Huss
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Matt Gronostaj
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.40
Jesse Baker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bret Sokoloff + Kevin Roedel4167% gamesnot enough data
Rob Dannemiller + Bret Sokoloff033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Kam
17W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.83
3.5
Bret Sokoloff
9W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%65%34%
3.44
Kevin Roedel
26W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
Greg Thornbury
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%88%12%
3.33
3.5
David van Horn
7W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Rob Dannemiller
6W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Graham Heard
19W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.13
3
Curt Goetsch
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Dan Huss
7W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
Matt Gronostaj
12W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
9%89%1%
2.69
Jesse Baker
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
76%24%<1%
2.40
Michael-John Garnett
2W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.