Teams

Miami-Dade/Sengupta

2022 Miami-Dade Mixed 18 & Over - Spring · 7.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.78 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 DoublesLeonardo Concha / Gema de Dios vs Lissette Viloria / Julio Salazar6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAna Pastorino / Florian Hafner vs Zule Abad / Jose Vera1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 DoublesGema de Dios / Florian Hafner vs Lissette Viloria / Jose Vera6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKristin Anderson / Federico Molinari vs Paula Jaramillo / Ramon Cordova3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAna Pastorino / Leonardo Concha vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesIgnacio Avila / Maria Concha vs Lissette Viloria / Ramon Cordova6-4, 6-2
W#1 DoublesSchubert Sengupta / Judy Prado vs Julio Salazar / Pilar Gomez6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAna Pastorino / Florian Hafner vs Paula Jaramillo / Ramon Cordova6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAndreina Carvallo / Ignacio Avila vs Bexis Gomez / Yony Moy5-7, 5-7
W#1 DoublesSchubert Sengupta / Judy Prado vs Lissette Viloria / Bryant Carreno5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMaria Concha / Federico Molinari vs Bexis Gomez / Jose A Viloria2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Ignacio Avila
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.89
3.82
Diego Mateluna
published 4
3.81
Judy Prado
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Gema de Dios
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Leonardo Concha
published
3.53
Margarita Nunez
published
3.48
Federico Molinari
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Schubert Sengupta
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.36
Ana Pastorino
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Claudia Taboada
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Schubert Sengupta + Ana Pastorino5350% gamesnot enough data
Federico Molinari + Ana Pastorino1441% gamesnot enough data
Schubert Sengupta + Judy Prado213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ignacio Avila
121W–36L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
3.95
4
Alejandro Gonzalez
22W–25L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Diego Mateluna
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Judy Prado
208W–126L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Gema de Dios
297W–204L career · 2 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
Leonardo Concha
2W–12L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.55
Margarita Nunez
7W–13L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.53
3.5
Federico Molinari
252W–115L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Schubert Sengupta
298W–227L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Ana Pastorino
288W–153L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Claudia Taboada
6W–11L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.