Teams

ACAC-Krebs

2022 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over Winter · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.56 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-03-27vs BURK-ColginLost 02
L#1 DoublesDavid Knudson / Elizabeth Coleman vs Tyler Sinsabaugh / Gail Russell3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesEddie Kim / Brittany Krebs vs Joseph Golden / Catherine Sweeney2-6, 4-6
2022-03-25Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDavid Knudson / Elizabeth Coleman vs Charles Sipe / Jeanette Kim7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2022-02-27vs WW-JesseeSplit 11
L#2 DoublesBrittany Krebs / Toussaint Manley vs Robert Nilson / Bobbie Lou Oley3-6, 4-5
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Coleman / Anant Singh vs Mark Wickersham / Louise O'Connor6-4, 5-4
2022-01-30vs MAC-TalamoWon 10
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Coleman / David Knudson vs Lidia Cousins / Byron Roberts6-4, 5-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
David Knudson
published 4
3.77
Grace Kim
published 4
3.63
Eddie Kim
published 3.5
3.48
Irvin Banks
published 3.5
3.42
Anant Singh
published 3.5
3.36
Reginald Tabor
published
3.33
Toussaint Manley
published
3.28
Jeffrey Johnson
published
3.27
Brittany Krebs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Elena Carter
published 3.5
3.23
Nikki Callaghan
published
3.21
Elizabeth Coleman
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.78
Chuck W Carter
published 3
2.66
Teresa McClellan
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Knudson
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Grace Kim
24W–26L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
3.5
Eddie Kim
30W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%17%83%
3.63
3.5
Irvin Banks
27W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Anant Singh
33W–31L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
Reginald Tabor
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
Toussaint Manley
10W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%89%10%
3.33
Jeffrey Johnson
23W–24L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Brittany Krebs
99W–85L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Elena Carter
19W–15L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Nikki Callaghan
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Elizabeth Coleman
172W–119L career · 12 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
3
Chuck W Carter
16W–19L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
2.78
Teresa McClellan
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.