Teams

LBK Public Aitken

2024 Sarasota Adult 65 & Over Winter · 8.0 W Friday

8 players · average NTRP 3.60 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-03-29vs LWR No Drama MamasSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJoyce Bastarache / Michelle Coates vs Andrea Deitch / Kathy Rain6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHelen Turner / Ute Vela-Marquez vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-03-15vs Sarasota/Duncan/65&Over8.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichelle Coates / Linda Aitken vs Deanna Allard / Yvonne Ghilardi0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesHelen Turner / Arden Allen vs Constance Duncan / Susie Lentile0-6, 1-6
2024-03-01vs River Strand PetersenWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichelle Coates / Lilia Johnson vs Helen Petersen / Christie Stephenson6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesBettye Sykes / Ute Vela-Marquez vs Hattie Grimsley / Sharyn Quiros1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-02-23vs LBK Club BavelyLost 01
L#2 DoublesGail Russell / Bettye Sykes vs Karen Byles / Sandra Duryea2-6, 3-6
2024-02-16vs LWR No Drama MamasSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJoyce Bastarache / Michelle Coates vs Kerstin Hylen-Sundstrom / Kathy Lewis6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesArden Allen / Helen Turner vs Wendy Zevin / Linda Frazier4-6, 5-7
2024-02-09vs Sarasota/Duncan/65&Over8.0WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMichelle Coates / Joyce Bastarache vs Constance Duncan / Maureen Rasp-Glose6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesHelen Turner / Elaine Jessop vs Barbara Belanger / Yvonne Ghilardi0-6, 4-6
2024-02-02vs LBK Club BavelyWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoyce Bastarache / Michelle Coates vs Linda Gillott / Sandra Duryea6-2, 6-2
2024-01-28vs River Strand PetersenSplit 11
W#2 DoublesBettye Sykes / Lilia Johnson vs Linda Colon / Chris Poole7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMargaret Stanton / Helen Turner vs Leslie Adkins / Helen Petersen0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 W Friday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Michelle Coates
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Mary Jane Waite
published
3.32
Gail Russell
published 3.5
3.32
Helen Turner
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.25
Bettye Sykes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Molly Gleason
published
3.02
Ann Kelmenson
published 3.5
Margaret Stanton
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Michelle Coates
52W–53L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Jane Waite
50W–38L career · no lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.67
3.5
Gail Russell
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Helen Turner
34W–67L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Bettye Sykes
84W–81L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
Molly Gleason
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Ann Kelmenson
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
3.02
Margaret Stanton
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.