Teams

Sets Pistols

2024 USTA ADULT 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

19 players · average NTRP 3.91 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-06-26vs Early RisersLost 12
W#1 DoublesTravis Hopkey / Ben Meibergen vs Robert Miranda / Ryan van de Graaff2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRay Cochrane / Noe Lopez vs Romeo Tobias / Ben Rice3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesDan Wold vs Drew Barton5-7, 4-6
2024-06-24vs Joint Chiefs of StashLost 02
L#2 DoublesDan Wold / Ray Cochrane vs Steve Bard / Martin Howard2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCasey Boren / Chris Gussner vs Tom von Alten / David Holt0-6, 4-6
2024-06-19vs OverratedLost 12
W#1 DoublesNoe Lopez / Ray Cochrane vs Drew McMains / Matt McKinlay6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCasey Boren / Luke Felt vs Chad Anderson / Preston Free3-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesDan Wold vs Matt Stegemann2-6, 2-6
2024-06-17vs MSA 4.0 (Mas Serve Aces)Won 20
W#1 DoublesChris Gussner / Matt Sheils vs Shane Vaughan / Dave Agler6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCasey Boren / Travis Hopkey vs Mike Cooley / Michael Simpson2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-06-12Lost 01
L#2 SinglesChad Trued vs Miles Brown6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-06-10vs Over ServedLost 02
L#2 DoublesTravis Hopkey / Jeffrey Raulston vs Jacob Roberts / Jacob Sessions2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRay Cochrane / Chris Gussner vs Jeffrey Wood / Di-Yuan Tzeng2-6, 1-6
2024-06-05vs CHAK DE BOISE STARSSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTravis Hopkey / Ben Meibergen vs Shyam Anantharaman / Rick Stoddard7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesChad Trued vs Tiernan Benner4-6, 1-6
2024-05-29vs Joint Chiefs of StashLost 02
L#2 SinglesDan Wold vs Jay Dark4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCasey Boren / Ray Cochrane vs David Holt / David Scott3-6, 1-6
2024-05-22vs OverratedLost 03
L#1 DoublesChris Gussner / Matt Sheils vs Indranil Roy / Alan Ezcurra6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJeffrey Raulston vs Matt Stegemann0-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesChad Trued vs Drew McMains3-6, 0-6
2024-05-20vs MSA 4.0 (Mas Serve Aces)Won 20
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Raulston / Dan Wold vs Brad Daines / Anthony Magnuson6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesEric Boyington / Ray Cochrane vs Andy Emerson / Scott Henson6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Austin Wilkes
published 4
3.91
3.86
Noe Lopez
published 4
3.81
Alex Henrie
published 4
3.81
Justin Armstrong
published 4
3.75
Chris Gussner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Dan Wold
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.71
Chad Trued
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.66
Jacob Wingerd
published 4
3.65
Leon Samuels
published 4
3.60
Eric Boyington
published 4
3.57
Bob Haycock
published 3.5
3.55
Ben Meibergen
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.55
Matt Sheils
published 4
3.27
Luke Felt
published 3.5
Casey Boren
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Jeffrey Raulston
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Ray Cochrane
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Travis Hopkey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Noe Lopez + Justin Armstrong4452% games+17.1% vs expected
Luke Felt + Bob Haycock5455% games+9.7% vs expected
Alex Henrie + Austin Wilkes12261% games+2.0% vs expected
Chad Trued + Bob Haycock231455% games−1.6% vs expected
Eric Boyington + Matt Sheils71250% games−6.3% vs expected
Ray Cochrane + Matt Sheils61644% gamesnot enough data
Travis Hopkey + Eric Boyington101051% gamesnot enough data
Ray Cochrane + Travis Hopkey8950% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Austin Wilkes
55W–28L career · no lines in 2024
<1%39%61%
4.04
4
Raymond Verveckken
63W–45L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.91
4
Noe Lopez
73W–86L career · no lines in 2024
<1%85%14%
3.86
4
Alex Henrie
75W–25L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.81
4
Justin Armstrong
43W–35L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Chris Gussner
14W–32L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.75
4
Dan Wold
22W–43L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Chad Trued
67W–77L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Jacob Wingerd
92W–71L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
3.66
4
Leon Samuels
115W–92L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Eric Boyington
65W–87L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Bob Haycock
145W–102L career · type A · no lines in 2024
<1%30%70%
3.57
4
Ben Meibergen
104W–52L career · 11 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Matt Sheils
54W–108L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Luke Felt
101W–105L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Casey Boren
84W–99L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jeffrey Raulston
52W–45L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ray Cochrane
90W–136L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Travis Hopkey
95W–75L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.