Teams

MO/Crouthers/55&Over8.0W

2026 Springfield Adult 55 & Over League · 8.0 Combined Women

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MISSOURI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-17vs Beverly HorvitLost 12
L#1 DoublesLucy Stein / Cheryl Ballou vs Pam McAllister / Sara Pauley3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesChristina Britt / Julie Skinner vs Katherine Wilson / Karen Thies2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesKathy Crouthers / Allison Steiner vs Beverly Horvit / April Edwards7-6, 6-3
2026-05-17vs Beverly HorvitWon 30
W#1 DoublesLucy Stein / Nancy Rahmeyer vs Sara Pauley / Beverly Horvit5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSandra Kaloupek / Kelly Mueller vs Pam McAllister / April Edwards7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKathy Crouthers / Christina Johnson vs Katherine Wilson / Karen Thies6-1, 6-1
2026-05-02vs Beverly HorvitWon 21
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Doshier / Nancy Rahmeyer vs Bobbi Carter / Debbie Murray0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKelly Mueller / Sandra Kaloupek vs Pam McAllister / Kate Mehle6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHee-Sun Kim / Sara Lester vs Beverly Horvit / Laurie Everett6-2, 6-0
2026-05-02vs Beverly HorvitWon 21
W#1 DoublesPatricia Musick / Cheryl Ballou vs Bobbi Carter / Debbie Murray6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHee-Sun Kim / Sara Lester vs Pam McAllister / April Edwards3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKelly Mueller / Sandra Kaloupek vs Laurie Everett / Kate Mehle6-0, 6-4
2026-04-23vs Beverly HorvitLost 12
L#1 DoublesKelly Mueller / Sandra Kaloupek vs Kate Mehle / Pam McAllister7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCheryl Ballou / Elizabeth Doshier vs Evelien Rietveld / Debbie Murray4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChristina Britt / Julie Skinner vs Karen Thies / Laurie Everett6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2026-04-16vs Beverly HorvitWon 21
W#1 DoublesHee-Sun Kim / Christina Johnson vs Debbie Murray / Evelien Rietveld6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKathy Crouthers / Allison Steiner vs Bobbi Carter / Sara Pauley6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesPatricia Musick / Cheryl Ballou vs Katherine Wilson / Karen Thies6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Combined Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Elizabeth Doshier
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.94
Sandra Kaloupek
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.75
Hee-Sun Kim
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.74
Kelly Mueller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.65
Allison Steiner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.61
Christina Britt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.51
Kathy Crouthers
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.42
Cheryl Ballou
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.38
Sara Lester
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.35
Julie Skinner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Lucy Stein
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nancy Rahmeyer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Patricia Musick
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Mueller + Sandra Kaloupek14460% games+4.1% vs expected
Kathy Crouthers + Allison Steiner4350% games−0.0% vs expected
Cheryl Ballou + Lucy Stein8164% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Rahmeyer + Lucy Stein7163% gamesnot enough data
Julie Skinner + Kathy Crouthers3349% gamesnot enough data
Cheryl Ballou + Allison Steiner3345% gamesnot enough data
Patricia Musick + Kathy Crouthers4164% gamesnot enough data
Patricia Musick + Julie Skinner314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Elizabeth Doshier
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sandra Kaloupek
68W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Christina Johnson
7W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Hee-Sun Kim
85W–75L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
Kelly Mueller
23W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Allison Steiner
17W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Christina Britt
28W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
3.61
Kathy Crouthers
32W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
3.51
3.5
Cheryl Ballou
52W–52L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.42
Sara Lester
45W–43L career · 2 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
3.38
Julie Skinner
28W–38L career · 2 lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
3.35
Lucy Stein
47W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nancy Rahmeyer
31W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Patricia Musick
67W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.