Teams

Eagle Landing - Brink

2025 Duval Adult 55 & Over - Women Winter · 6.0 Adult 55 & Over Winter

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-02-20vs Winter Winner - Deercreek - KurtzLost 03
L#1 DoublesDiane Forhan / Kathy Evans vs Stephanie Engelhardt / Reba Shrewsbury4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLian Cutting / PATSY REYNOLDS vs Melissa Kurtz / Torree Lein3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Cross / Elizabeth Sotomayor vs Alisa Blanchard / Karen Sayre5-7, 3-6
2025-02-15vs Winter Winner - Deercreek - KurtzLost 12
W#1 DoublesDiane Forhan / Mary Moody vs Stephanie Engelhardt / Tina Schumacher6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Cross / Cindy Mullennix vs Karen Sayre / Alisa Blanchard1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLian Cutting / Denise Graham vs Jody Layne / Buffy Joyce2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Adult 55 & Over Winter have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
PATSY REYNOLDS
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Maureen Ruiz
published
3.01
Pam Fritz
published
3.00
Diane Forhan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Susan Brink
published
2.82
Kathy Evans
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Cindy Mullennix
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Denise Graham
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Mary Moody
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
Elizabeth Sotomayor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Karen Cross
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Lian Cutting
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diane Forhan + Susan Brink3454% games+3.0% vs expected
PATSY REYNOLDS + Maureen Ruiz224 matchesnot enough data
Diane Forhan + Maureen Ruiz213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

PATSY REYNOLDS
13W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
Maureen Ruiz
17W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
Pam Fritz
11W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.01
3
Diane Forhan
19W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
Susan Brink
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83
Kathy Evans
17W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
92%8%<1%
2.82
3
Cindy Mullennix
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Denise Graham
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mary Moody
13W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
6%93%1%
2.71
3
Elizabeth Sotomayor
7W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.61
Karen Cross
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lian Cutting
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.