Teams

Ligh/18/6.5/CM/BREC

2026 BR Southern Combo 18 & Over - Men · 6.5 BR (18&O) Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.21 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 17 6:30 PM
BREC Forest Park Tennis Center
Sep 24 6:30 PM
Southern Oaks Athletic Club
Oct 1 6:30 PM
University Club Baton Rouge
Oct 8 6:30 PM
vs N/A
Randy Ligh
2026-08-20vs Mueller/18/6.5/CM/SOACWon 30
W#1 DoublesChad Landry / ROBERT WHITNEY vs Richard Miller / Steve Eskine7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChandra Kandula / Alexander Meinberg vs Nicholas Mueller / Tyson Duplantis7-6, 7-6
W#3 DoublesAntoine Davis / Tyler Busby vs Keaton Teas / Timothy Dantzler6-2, 6-2
2026-08-13vs Mannino/18/6.5/CM/UCWon 21
L#1 DoublesDavid Smith / ROBERT WHITNEY vs Justin Miller / Steve Caruso1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesChandra Kandula / Alexander Meinberg vs Matthew Mannino / Matt Hunt4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTyler Busby / J C Richardson vs SJ Guercio / Matthew Beychok6-3, 6-2
2026-08-06vs Wilbert/18/6.5/M/BRECWon 21
W#1 DoublesTyler Busby / Antoine Davis vs Lyndon Wilbert / Stewart Gordon7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAlexander Meinberg / Chad Landry vs Daniel Lockwood / Beau Comeaux3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAaron Harberson / Chandra Kandula vs Christian Hyde / Christopher Brewer6-3, 6-0
2026-07-30vs Ourso/18/6.5/CM/BRECLost 12
L#1 DoublesTyler Busby / Chandra Kandula vs Lawson Clegg / Conor McGuinness1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAlexander Meinberg / Chad Landry vs Zach Ingram / Mac McCall4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesROBERT WHITNEY / J C Richardson vs Tom Crowell / Chandler Dodd1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 6.5 BR (18&O) Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ourso/18/6.5/CM/BREC2051443
2Mueller/18/6.5/CM/SOAC2042555
3Ligh/18/6.5/CM/BREC21541184
4Mannino/18/6.5/CM/UC0224962
5Wilbert/18/6.5/M/BREC032715102

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Elmer Ceballos
published 3.5
3.30
Alexander Meinberg
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.23
Tyler Busby
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
3.17
Aaron Harberson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
ROBERT WHITNEY
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Antoine Davis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.08
Randy Ligh
published
3.01
Chad Landry
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.72
Chandra Kandula
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
J C Richardson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elmer Ceballos + Tyler Busby5261% games+12.2% vs expected
Alexander Meinberg + Tyler Busby4156% games+8.8% vs expected
Elmer Ceballos + Alexander Meinberg20556% games+3.2% vs expected
Tyler Busby + Randy Ligh123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Elmer Ceballos
42W–25L career · no lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Alexander Meinberg
40W–41L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
Tyler Busby
43W–47L career · 8 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Aaron Harberson
16W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
10%90%1%
3.17
ROBERT WHITNEY
41W–44L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.15
3
Antoine Davis
31W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.13
Randy Ligh
3W–17L career · no lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Chad Landry
8W–7L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.01
3
Chandra Kandula
45W–50L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.72
3
J C Richardson
5W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.