← Teams

GLVR-Crowley/Daoud

2024 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Jennifer Pultz
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.23
Linda Dallof
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Penny Langhammer
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published 3.5
2.87
Kimbra Kasch
published 3
2.84
Yone Akagi
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
—
Kate Maher
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.73
Amy Carolan
published 3
2.73
Kathleen Crowley
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.71
Katja Daoud
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Results8 ties
2024-06-15Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesPenny Langhammer / Kate Maher vs Haihua Su / Wendy Simons6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLinda Dallof vs Laura Davies6-1, 6-2
2024-06-08Won 4–0
W#1 DoublesPenny Langhammer / Amy Carolan vs Andrea Bailey / Michelle Roach6-1, 7-6
W#1 SinglesLinda Dallof vs Martine Larson6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKimbra Kasch / Kate Maher vs Grainne Koeberl / Betty Koon6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLuz Zanavich / Yone Akagi vs Lina Gao / Kalpana Berman7-6, 6-3
2024-06-02Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesPenny Langhammer / Jennifer Pultz vs Elena Kochetkova / Stephanie Titler6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKatja Daoud / Kimbra Kasch vs April Razey / Chelsea McGraw6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesYone Akagi / Katherine Fisher vs Alana Miner / Cheri Mosbrucker6-2, 7-6
2024-05-19Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesKatja Daoud / Kimbra Kasch vs Andrea Bailey / Kalpana Berman6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLinda Dallof vs Claudia Porter6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKathleen Crowley / Yone Akagi vs Pujitha Davuluri / Natasha Brady6-2, 6-1
2024-05-11Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesPenny Langhammer / Amy Carolan vs Deborah Cohen / Kathy Cooke6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesLinda Dallof vs Marissa Franck6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKathleen Crowley / Kate Maher vs Kate Sullivan / Amy Marr6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesColleen Atherton / Jennifer Pultz vs Wendy Buchanan / Lucia Parker6-4, 7-6
2024-05-05Won 4–0
W#1 DoublesPenny Langhammer / Jennifer Pultz vs Kristin Morris / Monica Conners6-0, 7-5
W#1 SinglesKate Maher vs Marissa Franck6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKatja Daoud / Amy Carolan vs Lucia Parker / Kristin DuVal0-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesYone Akagi / Kathleen Crowley vs Kathy Cooke / Erica Coughlin-Glaser6-2, 6-3
2024-04-28Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesPenny Langhammer / Jennifer Pultz vs Emily Shue / Adriana McCord6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKate Maher vs Becki Garrow6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKatja Daoud / Kimbra Kasch vs Christy Locke / Marcella Barta6-1, 6-1
2024-04-19Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesKimbra Kasch / Jennifer Pultz vs Julie Kafoury / Meagan Lake5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKathleen Crowley / Yone Akagi vs Marie Claire Dunne / Robin Bowerfind6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Jennifer Pultz
112W–67L career
1%99%0%
3.24
3.5
Linda Dallof
53W–63L career · type A
1%99%0%
3.23
3.5
Penny Langhammer
61W–36L career
2%97%0%
3.22
3
Kimbra Kasch
40W–45L career
0%97%3%
2.87
3
Yone Akagi
66W–52L career
0%98%2%
2.84
3
Kate Maher
36W–11L career
not enough data
—
3
Amy Carolan
30W–27L career
1%99%0%
2.73
3
Kathleen Crowley
60W–51L career
5%94%1%
2.73
3
Katja Daoud
71W–70L career
2%98%0%
2.71

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.