Teams

Chung - Triple Threat

2024 Howard Columbia Tri-Level 18 & Over · Howard Columbia Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.65 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2024-08-27vs Johnson - Net Success Tri-WWon 10
W#3 DoublesClaire Kim / Chengyin Wu vs Emily Trochimowicz / Jessica Myers6-2, 6-2
2024-08-24vs LaMoure - Tri-anglesWon 20
W#2 DoublesLaura Haney / Sanghee Lee vs Linda Tsai / Deborah Wright6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChengyin Wu / Karen Altman vs Julie Cabaniss / Rebecca Clark2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-08-22vs Mid-Atlantic/Phan/Tri-Level4.0-3.0WSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKim Steffen / Sanghee Lee vs Na Yi / Shrijoyee Ray6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesRoshni Fifadra / Claire Kim vs Jennifer Ivester / Chrissy Adair4-6, 1-6
2024-08-20vs Johnson - Net Success Tri-WWon 10
W#3 DoublesLindsay Preissler / Chengyin Wu vs Suzanne Arena / Wendy Hubbert6-1, 7-5
2024-08-18vs LaMoure - Tri-anglesWon 20
W#2 DoublesKim Steffen / Laura Haney vs Fiona Williamson / Linda Tsai7-6, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLindsay Preissler / Karen Altman vs Arianne Monroe / Jennifer Willie7-5, 6-4
2024-08-15vs Mid-Atlantic/Phan/Tri-Level4.0-3.0WSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKim Steffen / Sanghee Lee vs Tricia Muneses / Eloise Grose6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesChengyin Wu / Karen Altman vs Chrissy Adair / Nichole Hauswirth3-6, 1-6
2024-08-12vs Johnson - Net Success Tri-WWon 10
W#3 DoublesLindsay Preissler / Chengyin Wu vs Wendy Hubbert / Karen Spano6-0, 6-4
2024-08-10vs LaMoure - Tri-anglesWon 20
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Amerault / GENA CHUNG vs Deborah Wright / Julie Snavely7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRoshni Fifadra / Wenxi Li vs Julie Cabaniss / Becky Ronayne6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2024-08-07vs Mid-Atlantic/Phan/Tri-Level4.0-3.0WSplit 11
L#2 DoublesGENA CHUNG / Laura Haney vs Na Yi / Eloise Grose4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRoshni Fifadra / Wenxi Li vs Jennifer Ivester / Nichole Hauswirth6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2024-08-05vs LaMoure - Tri-anglesLost 01
L#3 DoublesClaire Kim / Roshni Fifadra vs Becky Ronayne / Jennifer Willie4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGENA CHUNG / Jessica Thompson vs Eloise Grose / Shrijoyee Ray2-6, 6-7
2024-07-31vs Johnson - Net Success Tri-WWon 10
W#3 DoublesChengyin Wu / Karen Altman vs Candace Tomczak / Gauri Turner6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Beth Steinberg
published 4.5
3.90
Susan Rhee
published
3.77
Wenxi Li
published
3.77
3.70
Kim Steffen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
June Means
published
3.49
Sanghee Lee
published
3.48
Chengyin Wu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Elvira McCullough
published 3.5
3.30
Laura Haney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
GENA CHUNG
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Roshni Fifadra
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Claire Kim
published 3.5
3.09
Karen Altman
published
3.07
Elizabeth Amerault
published 3.5
3.06
Sandy Friedman
published
2.79
Lindsay Preissler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Karen Jones
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lindsay Preissler + Roshni Fifadra314 matchesnot enough data
GENA CHUNG + Sanghee Lee123 matchesnot enough data
GENA CHUNG + Claire Kim123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Beth Steinberg
12W–13L career · no lines in 2024
74%26%<1%
3.92
Susan Rhee
32W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.90
Wenxi Li
29W–16L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Christine Callahan
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Kim Steffen
115W–95L career · 3 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.70
June Means
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.55
Sanghee Lee
38W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Chengyin Wu
88W–33L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Elvira McCullough
12W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.44
Laura Haney
374W–273L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
GENA CHUNG
122W–132L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Roshni Fifadra
129W–127L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Claire Kim
15W–14L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.17
Karen Altman
10W–22L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.09
3.5
Elizabeth Amerault
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
28%71%<1%
3.07
Sandy Friedman
5W–12L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.06
3
Lindsay Preissler
97W–96L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%93%5%
2.79
Karen Jones
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.