Teams

Greystone C. Club - Lucas

2025 B'ham Tri-Level Weeknight - 18 & Over M · W

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-08vs Riverchase Country Club - DaigleWon 21
L#1 DoublesMelanie Averill / Madison Averill vs Katie Steier / Shanette Daigle4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHannah Lucas / Jacqueline Diercks vs Megan Manley / Emily Masters6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesNicole Touliatos / Christina Norwood vs Katie Hutchison / Kimberly Woodall6-4, 6-0
2025-06-23vs West Homewood - DeHartWon 21
W#1 DoublesMarian Washburn / Melanie Averill vs Monicka Brown / Allison Novellino2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristy Berryman / Taylor Harrelson vs Jennifer DeHart / Rachael Josey7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesChristina Norwood / Nicole Touliatos vs Anna Marie Novellino / Mary Elizabeth Hansen2-6, 1-6
2025-06-14vs JLTC - Wilson/KennedySplit 11
L#1 DoublesHeather Feathers / Marian Washburn vs Evelyn Kennedy / Charlene Linson3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesGina Harris / Taylor Harrelson vs Candace Jones / Beverly Thomas6-4, 6-4
2025-06-09vs CCB - HardisonWon 21
L#1 DoublesMarian Washburn / Jacqueline Diercks vs Anne Herfurth / Gigi Weinacker2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesChristy Berryman / Taylor Harrelson vs Melissa Riser / Lindsey Beatty6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNicole Touliatos / Christina Norwood vs Robin Bromberg / Lauren White6-3, 6-2
2025-06-02vs Greystone Y - DuttonLost 03
L#1 DoublesMadison Averill / Melanie Averill vs Allie Dutton / Meghan Bradley0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTaylor Pate / Gina Harris vs Barkley Ward / ANGELA Dutton2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesNicole Touliatos / Christina Norwood vs April Boswell / Riley Drouin3-6, 6-7
2025-05-19vs Pine Tree - BowenLost 02
L#1 DoublesMadison Averill / Melanie Averill vs Rhiannon Sharpe / Allie Black1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTaylor Pate / Christy Berryman vs Erynn Hassinger / Luci Ray2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings17 teams · W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BH - Puckett/Curran8020411144
2Greystone CC - Pauls/Brown7119513146
3Greystone Y - Dutton6117410127
4HCC - Dodd/Sipes 2025 TriLevel53141025214
5Pine Tree - Bowen4314715148
6Wald Pak - Connelly44111328211
7West Homewood - McFadden/Arnold339919166
8Greystone C. Club - Lucas3371123180
9JLTC - Wilson/Kennedy3491227189
10West Homewood - DeHart3481329201
11Riverchase Country Club - Daigle3481330213
12PRC - Holtz/Odom35121227196
13West Homewood - Peters35111330219
14CCB - Tovar35101432226
15CCB - Hardison2571428205
16Riverchase Country Club - Rodgers2691531209
17Gardendale - Wesley/Harris1722246278

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Heather Feathers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Taylor Harrelson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Taylor Pate
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Christina Norwood
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Marian Washburn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Jacqueline Diercks
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.63
Hannah Lucas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.54
Melanie Averill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.49
Nicole Touliatos
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.39
Christy Berryman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Madison Averill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rachel Hoagland
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicole Touliatos + Christina Norwood3445% gamesnot enough data
Jacqueline Diercks + Marian Washburn134 matchesnot enough data
Christy Berryman + Christina Norwood224 matchesnot enough data
Melanie Averill + Nicole Touliatos224 matchesnot enough data
Madison Averill + Melanie Averill033 matchesnot enough data
Christy Berryman + Taylor Harrelson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Heather Feathers
12W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%87%12%
2.85
Taylor Harrelson
9W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
Taylor Pate
21W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Christina Norwood
20W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.67
Marian Washburn
30W–40L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
2.65
3
Jacqueline Diercks
14W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
2.64
3
Hannah Lucas
8W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
15%85%<1%
2.63
Melanie Averill
20W–37L career · 4 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
2.54
Nicole Touliatos
6W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.49
3
Christy Berryman
10W–23L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.39
Madison Averill
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rachel Hoagland
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.