← Teams

N OR-MPRC-Cook

2025 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.62 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Mary Lowblad
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.70
Adrienne VanBeckhoven
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.48
Judi Babcock
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.46
Heike Droste
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.43
Molly Taylor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Vivian Nguyen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Kathy Cook
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Karen McNairy
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2024-11-24Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesHeike Droste / Karen McNairy vs Julie Arness / Shirley Derby6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesSaki Newman / Vivian Nguyen vs Patricia Morrison / Linda Underwood6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKathy Cook / Anita Johnson vs Tuni Stecker / Cecile Bamer2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-11-03Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesHeike Droste / Adrienne VanBeckhoven vs Cara Williams / Garrene Mcgale6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJudi Babcock / Karen McNairy vs Gail Bolte / Heather MacPherson6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJan Koenig / Kathy Cook vs Seungja Shin / Mihee Park7-6, 6-2
2024-10-20Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesJudi Babcock / Karen McNairy vs Rochelle Pluymers / Lorna Goth6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMary Lowblad / Heike Droste vs Lynne Nieda / Nancy Salisbury6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesVivian Nguyen / Saki Newman vs Jacqueline Wilcox / Julie Gorretta6-2, 6-1
2024-10-12Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesJudi Babcock / Mary Lowblad vs Sharon Loomis-Malin / Wendy Weddle6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAdrienne VanBeckhoven / Molly Taylor vs Blythe Knott / Stacey Burkhart6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJing Li / Karen McNairy vs Margo Reifenrath / Laurie Sykes6-1, 6-3
2024-09-29Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesSaki Newman / Adrienne VanBeckhoven vs Julie Arness / Karen Walker4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMolly Taylor / Jan Koenig vs Tuni Stecker / Christine Hattenhauer6-4, 6-2
2024-09-20Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesKaren McNairy / Saki Newman vs Katherine Farrell / Brooke Thompson6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKimberly Lanier / Molly Taylor vs Melanie DeSilva / Mary Hlady5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2024-09-14Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesJudi Babcock / Karen McNairy vs Michele Desmarais / Peg McClendon5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAdrienne VanBeckhoven / Molly Taylor vs Betty Grant / Judy Hamilton6-0, 6-2
2024-09-08Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesJudi Babcock / Karen McNairy vs Peg McClendon / Kaki Brenneman6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMolly Taylor / Vivian Nguyen vs Robin Collins / Carol Robertson6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKathy Cook / Anita Johnson vs Anne Fernando / Corinne Stewart6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Mary Lowblad
123W–61L career
4%95%1%
3.73
4
Adrienne VanBeckhoven
39W–22L career
3%97%0%
3.70
3.5
Judi Babcock
128W–57L career
0%85%15%
3.48
3.5
Heike Droste
158W–91L career
0%89%11%
3.46
3.5
Molly Taylor
57W–28L career
0%91%9%
3.43
3.5
Vivian Nguyen
178W–99L career
0%98%2%
3.37
3.5
Kathy Cook
85W–36L career
8%92%0%
3.15
3.5
Karen McNairy
49W–62L career
21%79%0%
3.05

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.