Teams

HRCA-N PINK

2023 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - SUMMER DAYTIME

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-08-08vs PRKR GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesMollie Anderson / Tosha MacK vs Diane Bailey / Jodi Novak6-4, 6-3
2023-07-25vs SH GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesMelissa Pace / Tina Ruggiero vs Carissa Weinfeld / Nora Dispense2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMollie Anderson / Rebecca Robbins vs Hillary Biskner / Priscilla Hawkinson4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-06-27Won 10
W#1 SinglesTosha MacK vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - SUMMER DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.45 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.63
Mollie Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Rachelle Jeppson
published
2.46
Leslie Prusse
published
2.44
Tosha MacK
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.40
Sarah Hays
published
2.40
Melissa Pace
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.35
Andrea Pickett
published 2.5
2.31
Becky Tribett
published 2.5
Angie Smart
published 2.5
Tina Ruggiero
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rachelle Jeppson + Becky Tribett4154% games+11.4% vs expected
Mollie Anderson + Sarah Hays3638% games−8.3% vs expected
Tosha MacK + Melissa Pace4170% gamesnot enough data
Tosha MacK + Sarah Hays224 matchesnot enough data
Tosha MacK + Leslie Prusse404 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Pace + Mollie Anderson134 matchesnot enough data
Mollie Anderson + Leslie Prusse404 matchesnot enough data
Tosha MacK + Andrea Pickett033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mollie Anderson
46W–37L career · 1 line in 2023
15%85%<1%
2.63
Rachelle Jeppson
20W–6L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
2.62
Leslie Prusse
20W–8L career · no lines in 2023
0%63%37%
2.46
2.5
Tosha MacK
39W–49L career · 2 lines in 2023
0%68%32%
2.44
Sarah Hays
48W–45L career · no lines in 2023
0%77%23%
2.40
Melissa Pace
29W–27L career · 1 line in 2023
78%22%<1%
2.40
2.5
Andrea Pickett
19W–12L career · no lines in 2023
0%88%12%
2.35
2.5
Becky Tribett
14W–7L career · no lines in 2023
0%92%8%
2.31
2.5
Angie Smart
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tina Ruggiero
22W–11L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.