Teams

2-HRemley-Eno 9.5

2023 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · Eno River 18 & Over Combo 9.5 Women Evening

8 players · average NTRP 4.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-10-11vs 3-LLazaro-EnoLost 01
L#1 DoublesHeather Remley / Bren Woods vs Anna Soffin / MacY Fisher0-6, 4-6
2023-10-04vs 1-KMedynskaya-EnoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPaula Collado Cordon / Ivette Duran vs Kate Medynskaya / Tanita Tedamrongwanish6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesHeather Remley / Bren Woods vs Heidi Steiber / Tanya Sirivolu4-6, 2-6
2023-09-20vs 3-LLazaro-EnoWon 20
W#1 DoublesAnnie McCullough / Bren Woods vs Jamie Breunig / Lisa Spees6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesHeather Remley / Julia Howard vs Brandy Kmiec / Anna Soffin2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-08-30vs 3-LLazaro-EnoSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKelly Moler Glass / Heather Remley vs Zoe Dubrow / Emily Callahan6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesIvette Duran / Bren Woods vs Jennifer Hiller / Anna Soffin6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2023-08-09vs 3-LLazaro-EnoWon 20
W#2 DoublesHeather Remley / Annie McCullough vs Jamie Breunig / Leslie Boesch6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesPaula Collado Cordon / Mallory Short vs Anna Soffin / Jennifer Hiller6-4, 6-2
2023-08-02vs 1-KMedynskaya-EnoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAnnie McCullough / Bren Woods vs Laura Alvarez / Jennifer McEntee7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKaren Griffin / Paula Collado Cordon vs Anne Frautschi / Susanne Zuniga2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Eno River 18 & Over Combo 9.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.44 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.80
Elizabeth Hodges
published
4.63
Kelly Moler Glass
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.51
Ivette Duran
published
4.43
Paula Collado Cordon
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 5
4.42
Heather Remley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 5
4.32
Julia Howard
published
3.95
Bren Woods
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4.5
Hannah Dahlem
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Remley + Kelly Moler Glass5059% gamesnot enough data
Heather Remley + Bren Woods224 matchesnot enough data
Heather Remley + Paula Collado Cordon123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Hodges
14W–3L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.80
5
Kelly Moler Glass
69W–48L career · 1 line in 2023
no projection at this level
4.63
Ivette Duran
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.51
5
Paula Collado Cordon
64W–56L career · 5 lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.43
5
Heather Remley
298W–153L career · 8 lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.42
Julia Howard
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.32
4.5
Bren Woods
77W–40L career · 9 lines in 2023
63%37%<1%
3.95
Hannah Dahlem
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.