Teams

LifeTime Plano/Pho-Bednar W4.5S

2024 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Saturday League

20 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for S W. Saturday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.22 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.45
Christy Vutam
published 4.5
4.41
Celesta Caldwell
published 4.5
4.41
Luisa Osorio
published
4.32
Yvon Pho
published
4.31
Sonia Moorthy
published
4.29
Marian Bednar
published
4.28
Keasha Behrman
published
4.28
Ana Castano-Mears
published 4.5
4.25
Val Weidlich
published
4.11
Maki Berman
published
4.09
Adriana Akhtar
published 4.5
4.07
Laura Jacobi
published
4.03
Melissa Hanold
published
3.76
Elizabeth Chao
published
Dusti Kuehne
published
Emily McRae
published
Kate Poplin Ikeda
published
Olivia Arroyo
published
Rachel Stokes
published
Samantha Ritz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Celesta Caldwell + Val Weidlich134 matchesnot enough data
Rachel Stokes + Luisa Osorio404 matchesnot enough data
Celesta Caldwell + Keasha Behrman123 matchesnot enough data
Ana Castano-Mears + Luisa Osorio213 matchesnot enough data
Yvon Pho + Luisa Osorio303 matchesnot enough data
Luisa Osorio + Keasha Behrman303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christy Vutam
31W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
4.45
4.5
Celesta Caldwell
31W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
4.41
Luisa Osorio
35W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
4.41
Yvon Pho
27W–13L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
4.32
Sonia Moorthy
34W–17L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
4.31
Marian Bednar
23W–13L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
4.29
Keasha Behrman
33W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
4.28
4.5
Ana Castano-Mears
13W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
4.28
Val Weidlich
10W–6L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
4.25
Maki Berman
26W–22L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
4.11
4.5
Adriana Akhtar
9W–7L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
4.09
Laura Jacobi
15W–2L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
4.07
Melissa Hanold
1W–12L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.03
Elizabeth Chao
9W–6L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.76
Dusti Kuehne
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Emily McRae
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kate Poplin Ikeda
10W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Olivia Arroyo
15W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rachel Stokes
11W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Samantha Ritz
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.