Teams

Lost Forest - Buzzsaws

Adult 18 & Over 3.0 - 5.0 Men's Monday · Men 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-01vs Lost Forest - LumberjacksLost 14
L#1 DoublesRoscoe Vasquez / Jack Sheahan vs Stephen Milton / Neil Rubenstein1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJonathan Hicks vs Nishchay Bharati6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Whelen / Larry Kintz vs Chirag Amin / Jeffery Wilson1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesCasey Doherty vs CHARLES HILDEBRAND3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesXiang Cheng / Xavier Munoz vs Carlos Oseguera / Riley Rizzo6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2026-05-18vs Lost Forest - LumberjacksLost 03
L#1 DoublesJonathan Hicks / Michael Whelen vs Peter Tran / CHARLES HILDEBRAND3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesXiang Cheng / David Jin vs Jeffery Wilson / Christopher Prescott3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesJack Sheahan vs Riley Rizzo4-6, 1-6
2026-05-11vs Lost Forest - LumberjacksLost 05
L#1 DoublesXavier Munoz / Josh Freedkin vs Denton Carman / Riley Rizzo2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesMichael Whelen vs Peter Tran0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJoe Dowell / David Jin vs CHARLES HILDEBRAND / Michael Hughes0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesXiang Cheng vs Chirag Amin3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMaylon Atchison / Roscoe Vasquez vs Neil Rubenstein / Carlos Oseguera3-6, 1-6
2026-05-04vs Lost Forest - LumberjacksLost 23
L#1 DoublesJoe Dowell / Maylon Atchison vs Christopher Prescott / CHARLES HILDEBRAND1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJonathan Hicks vs Michael Hughes6-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJack Sheahan / Xiang Cheng vs Stephen Milton / Nishchay Bharati0-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesMichael Whelen vs Chirag Amin7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDavid Jin / Eric Guerrero vs Carlos Oseguera / Riley Rizzo1-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-04-27vs Lost Forest - LumberjacksLost 14
L#1 DoublesEric Guerrero / Xavier Munoz vs CHARLES HILDEBRAND / Denton Carman1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJonathan Hicks vs Riley Rizzo5-7, 0-3
L#2 DoublesJoe Dowell / Maylon Atchison vs Christopher Prescott / Peter Tran1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesMichael Whelen vs Carlos Oseguera6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJosh Freedkin / Larry Kintz vs Jeffery Wilson / Michael Hughes1-6, 1-6
2026-04-20vs Lost Forest - LumberjacksLost 03
L#1 DoublesXiang Cheng / Xavier Munoz vs Stephen Milton / CHARLES HILDEBRAND0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJack Sheahan vs Chirag Amin4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesCasey Doherty / Joe Dowell vs Neil Rubenstein / Jeffery Wilson3-6, 2-6
2026-04-13vs Lost Forest - LumberjacksLost 04
L#1 DoublesJosh Freedkin / Xiang Cheng vs CHARLES HILDEBRAND / Christopher Prescott0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMaylon Atchison / Roscoe Vasquez vs Joey DeFalco / Neil Rubenstein2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesXavier Munoz vs Riley Rizzo6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLarry Kintz / Casey Doherty vs Peter Tran / Nishchay Bharati0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Jonathan Hicks
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.90
Michael Whelen
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.87
Jack Sheahan
usually #1 Singles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Eric Guerrero
published 3
2.73
Josh Freedkin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.70
Joe Dowell
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.67
Casey Doherty
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.61
Xavier Munoz
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
2.58
Xiang Cheng
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.58
Roscoe Vasquez
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.52
Maylon Atchison
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.52
Larry Kintz
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.51
David Jin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Larry Kintz + Michael Whelen11329% games−8.2% vs expected
Maylon Atchison + Joe Dowell033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jonathan Hicks
10W–35L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.04
Michael Whelen
9W–38L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Jack Sheahan
4W–6L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
2.87
3
Eric Guerrero
4W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Josh Freedkin
3W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
Joe Dowell
4W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Casey Doherty
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.67
Xavier Munoz
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
2.61
Xiang Cheng
1W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
2.58
Roscoe Vasquez
0W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
2.58
Maylon Atchison
1W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
2.52
Larry Kintz
3W–38L career · 3 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
2.52
3
David Jin
4W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
2.51

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.