Teams

No Strings Attached

2025 OKCAdult 40 & Over Day League · 3.5 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.25 / OKLAHOMA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
W#1 DoublesCarie Confer / Miranda Lenocker vs Megan Johnson / Megan Griffith6-0, 6-3
L#1 SinglesChristina von Hahmann vs Sunny Jerrim5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesHolly Ketchum / Laurie Brooks vs Lindsey Diffendaffer / Sarah Smith1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesIrene Jones / Sandra Bellido vs Dana Garner / Tenia Skinner3-6, 3-6
L#4 DoublesMichelle Holloway / Elba Sisco vs Evan English / Natalie Simon3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 DoublesJENNIE PRICE / Cindy Hendrick vs Terri Nevin-Hesselroth / Cathleen Clough2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesSandra Bellido vs Natalie Simon6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBouapha Walz / Holly Ketchum vs Lindsey Diffendaffer / Tara Houck7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJamie Runyan / Christina von Hahmann vs Niki McClintock / Sarah Smith4-6, 4-6
L#4 DoublesIrene Jones / Kathleen Ram vs Michele Webber / Lee Anne Stone2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Carie Confer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Amy High
published 3.5
3.18
Miranda Lenocker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Michelle Holloway
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
JENNIE PRICE
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Cindy Hendrick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Tammy Rainey
published
3.03
Irene Jones
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
2.99
Jamie Runyan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Holly Ketchum
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Sandra Bellido
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.92
Christina von Hahmann
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.88
Dawne Sullivan
published 3
2.78
Elba Sisco
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Laurie Brooks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Bouapha Walz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Kathleen Ram
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laurie Brooks + Dawne Sullivan4359% games+6.2% vs expected
Cindy Hendrick + Tammy Rainey3552% games+2.8% vs expected
Bouapha Walz + Christina von Hahmann3451% games+2.5% vs expected
Carie Confer + Miranda Lenocker491859% games+2.2% vs expected
Tammy Rainey + JENNIE PRICE18363% games+1.6% vs expected
Cindy Hendrick + JENNIE PRICE8457% games+0.4% vs expected
Laurie Brooks + JENNIE PRICE3355% games+0.1% vs expected
Michelle Holloway + Dawne Sullivan192050% games−0.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carie Confer
76W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Amy High
64W–64L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Miranda Lenocker
82W–35L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.18
Michelle Holloway
47W–43L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%1%
3.15
JENNIE PRICE
116W–47L career · 1 line in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Cindy Hendrick
152W–211L career · 1 line in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
Tammy Rainey
88W–79L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.13
Irene Jones
40W–48L career · 2 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.03
Jamie Runyan
13W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
Holly Ketchum
37W–45L career · 2 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
Sandra Bellido
27W–35L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.97
3
Christina von Hahmann
85W–79L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92
3
Dawne Sullivan
46W–40L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
2.88
Elba Sisco
85W–96L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Laurie Brooks
57W–49L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Bouapha Walz
67W–92L career · 1 line in 2025
15%84%1%
2.65
Kathleen Ram
37W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.