Teams

Yu.Barthes18A

2024 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-04-23vs Sh.Agresta18ALost 02
L#1 DoublesEvelyn Andino / Paula Westregard Bjorklund vs Shelia Knoll / Lori Jones3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Wolborsky / Ngoc Tran vs Sharon Agresta / Jennifer Holloman2-6, 3-6
2024-04-18vs Ta.Kozacko18ALost 02
L#2 DoublesJorgelina Stroud / Catherine Chavez vs Diane Sauer / Tobi Buckley1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Wolborsky / Ngoc Tran vs Kim Johnson / Caroline Fungaroli0-6, 1-6
2024-04-16vs An.Jones18AWon 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Wolborsky / Ngoc Tran vs Byerly Graves / Lisa Fultz6-4, 6-2
2024-04-09vs Na.Regan18ALost 02
L#1 SinglesJulie Newson vs Mariana Lima Gonzalez2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Wolborsky / Jorgelina Stroud vs Natalie Regan / Ashley Walton3-6, 1-6
2024-03-19vs Ki.Monsees18ALost 02
L#2 DoublesCatherine Chavez / Julie Newson vs Anna Kouba / Rachel Brown0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJorgelina Stroud / Ngoc Tran vs Jessica McIntyre / Allison Smith3-6, 3-6
2024-03-13vs El.Merritt18ALost 02
L#1 DoublesEvelyn Andino / Nicole Bye vs Julie Coyne / Ashley Gaylord2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Wolborsky / Julie Newson vs Libby Stubbs / Melissa Burke3-6, 4-6
2024-03-12vs Mi.Ladd18ALost 01
L#1 DoublesEvelyn Andino / Jorgelina Stroud vs Mindy Ladd / Holly Lotterhos4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Tatiana Nevmyrych
published
3.05
Wendy Pannell
published
3.03
Evelyn Andino
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Julie Newson
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #2 Singles 22% · published 3
2.98
Yuliya Barthes
published
2.94
Jennifer Wolborsky
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.64
Jorgelina Stroud
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.54
Catherine Chavez
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Evelyn Andino + Jennifer Wolborsky3945% games+0.8% vs expected
Jorgelina Stroud + Evelyn Andino044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tatiana Nevmyrych
2W–12L career · no lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
3.49
Wendy Pannell
8W–14L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.05
3.5
Evelyn Andino
67W–150L career · 3 lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.03
3
Julie Newson
70W–78L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
2.98
Yuliya Barthes
6W–20L career · no lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
2.98
3
Jennifer Wolborsky
172W–236L career · 14 lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Jorgelina Stroud
121W–177L career · 4 lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
2.64
3
Catherine Chavez
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
2.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.