Teams

LCTA18/Holena/Creekside

Other 18 & Over Singles League · Women 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-13vs LCTA18/Godfrey-Jackson/CTCLost 02
L#1 SinglesAmy Arrington vs Samantha Devetski1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesAly Sexton vs Katie Linton6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2026-06-06vs LCTA18/Gaunt/DICLost 02
L#1 SinglesAmy Arrington vs Erin Williams7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesLauren Claypoole vs Danna Hendrickson3-6, 2-6
2026-05-17vs LCTA18/Finneyfrock/St AndrewsLost 12
W#1 SinglesHannah Holena vs Laura Joines3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAllie McCrae vs Caroline Hicks5-7, 1-6
L#3 SinglesBrittany Kalivas vs Amanda Wright3-6, 4-6
2026-05-16vs LCTA 18/Zhang/LTPDIWon 21
W#1 SinglesHannah Holena vs Nell Hinchey4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAly Sexton vs Madeline Leo6-4, 6-3
L#3 SinglesAllie McCrae vs Katherine Matthews3-6, 2-6
2026-05-09vs LCTA18/Murphy/MPRLost 12
L#1 SinglesLauren Claypoole vs Katie Hakimi6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesHannah Holena vs Amie Waldeck6-4, 7-6
L#3 SinglesAly Sexton vs Kelley Wilds2-6, 1-6
2026-04-25vs LCTA18/Chapman/CreeksideSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAllie McCrae vs Anna Winters3-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesMadison Wist vs Megan Chapman6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Women 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LCTA18/Chapman/Creekside5112615130
2LCTA18/Gaunt/DIC3311718152
3LCTA18/Finneyfrock/St Andrews2471124172
4LCTA 18/Zhang/LTPDI2471125176
5LCTA18/Holena/Creekside1551329202

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Cooper Collier
published 3.5
3.50
Holly Gardner
published 3.5
3.39
Amy Arrington
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
3.27
Hannah Holena
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Brittany Kalivas
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Allie McCrae
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Aly Sexton
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.97
Lauren Claypoole
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.90
Madison Wist
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Stacey Powell
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cooper Collier
45W–15L career · no lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.51
3.5
Holly Gardner
66W–27L career · no lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.50
3.5
Amy Arrington
84W–57L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Alexandra Vorderbruegge
18W–1L career · no lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Hannah Holena
20W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Brittany Kalivas
31W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Allie McCrae
17W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Aly Sexton
1W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.04
Lauren Claypoole
68W–59L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
2.97
Madison Wist
12W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.90
Stacey Powell
50W–35L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.