Teams

CSRC WALTERS

2025 CTA TWILIGHT - SOCO · MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT - SOCO

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-03vs LTFCS CORDASCOLost 12
L#1 DoublesCraig Rogers / Michael White vs Keith Logeman / Steven Spillers6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTodd Briney vs Jeff Hensley2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesTravis Anderson / Ryan Hill vs Joseph D Sawyer / Cory Rogers7-6, 6-4
2025-08-20vs MEMPK CHINNERYWon 20
W#1 DoublesCraig Rogers / Michael Park vs Nick Hill / Joshua Trujillo6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJohn Abbott / Bob Ziuchkovski vs Allen Wu / Kenneth E Kuper6-3, 6-0
2025-08-13vs LTFCS COLESLost 02
L#1 DoublesRussell Walters / Bob Ziuchkovski vs Julio Diaz / Roderick Coles3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesTodd Briney vs Rob Wilson5-7, 1-6
2025-08-06vs FLYHS JONESWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichael White / John Abbott vs Eric Davis / Thomas Young4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRyan Hill vs Eric Howard6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRussell Walters / Travis Anderson vs Chase Campbell / Matt Campbell7-5, 6-3
2025-08-01vs LTFCS COLESWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichael Park / Craig Rogers vs Julio Diaz / Larry Brachfeld6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesRyan Hill vs Derek Kinzo6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesRussell Walters / Todd Briney vs Roderick Coles / Rob Wilson2-6, 2-6
2025-07-30vs LTFCS CORDASCOLost 12
L#1 DoublesCraig Rogers / Michael Park vs MICHAEL REECE / Marc Whorton2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTodd Briney vs Jeff Hensley2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRyan Hill / Travis Anderson vs Cory Rogers / Michael Blevin6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT - SOCO
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LTFCS CORDASCO6015313132
2FLYHS JONES4210819153
3CSRC WALTERS3310820167
4LTFCS COLES249920175
5MEMPK CHINNERY0611735213

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Craig Rogers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Russell Walters
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.73
John Abbott
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.73
Bob Ziuchkovski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.68
Ryan Hill
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Todd Briney
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Craig Rogers
17W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.88
Russell Walters
7W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
John Abbott
6W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Bob Ziuchkovski
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Ryan Hill
35W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Todd Briney
3W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.