Teams

Soh 3.5

2025 Montgomery Adult 40 & Over · Montgomery Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.38 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-16vs String TheoryLost 01
L#2 DoublesJin-Gu Lee / Jin Soh vs Ainsley Gibson / Xavier Ona2-6, 6-7
2025-03-05vs I'd Hit That 40+ 3.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJin Soh / Jin-Gu Lee vs Larry Wall / Alexandre Fines2-6, 1-6
2025-02-23vs String TheoryWon 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Kim / Jin Soh vs John Sze / Ivan Teelucksingh6-1, 6-2
2025-01-31vs Smiles and Laughs 40+3.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJin Soh / Paul Song vs Max Wang / Renhuan Xu1-6, 2-6
2025-01-21vs I'd Hit That 40+ 3.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJin Soh / Min-Ho Lee vs Daniel Laczko / Dominik Cieslak2-6, 3-6
2025-01-15vs Sultans of SwingLost 01
L#2 DoublesJaeil Ahn / Jin Soh vs Matt Baumann / Dileep Nair5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-01-11vs Le BallerWon 10
W#2 DoublesJung Kim / Jin Soh vs George Wang / PAUL BAIK6-2, 6-2
2025-01-07vs Smiles and Laughs 40+3.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesJin Soh / Jin-Gu Lee vs Renhuan Xu / Jinghua Lu4-6, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Jeeho Lee
published
3.40
Jin-Gu Lee
published
3.32
Su Hong
published
3.31
Chan Young Jung
published 3.5
3.28
Jaeil Ahn
published 3.5
3.27
Jin Soh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.22
Paul Song
published
3.11
Young Seung Kim
published
2.82
Insung Kang
published 3
Min-Ho Lee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Young Seung Kim + Insung Kang2446% games+9.2% vs expected
Jin Soh + Young Seung Kim123 matchesnot enough data
Jin Soh + Jin-Gu Lee213 matchesnot enough data
Su Hong + Jaeil Ahn303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeeho Lee
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.54
Jin-Gu Lee
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
3.40
Su Hong
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Chan Young Jung
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Jaeil Ahn
10W–11L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Jin Soh
58W–47L career · 8 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
Paul Song
13W–15L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
Young Seung Kim
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
3
Insung Kang
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%9%
2.82
Min-Ho Lee
29W–30L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.