Teams

Drumlins -Moran

Men's Interclub · Summer 2026 Interclub

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / WESTERN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-12Lost 01
L#2 Male DoublesJake Massaro / Philip Smith vs Prashant Kaul / James Burgess2-6, 4-6
2026-06-24Won 10
W#1 Male DoublesJake Massaro / Philip Smith vs Lucas Kaplan / John Wojcikiewicz6-1, 6-7, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Summer 2026 Interclub
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SFTC - Lee6116511129
2SFTC - Wallenstein5216510112
3Elevate5212922197
4Drumlins -Moran1661534259
5Drumlins - Mone1742041278

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Michael Passalacqua
published
3.34
C Thomas Hogge
usually #1 Male Singles 42%, also #1 Male Doubles 42% · published 3.5
3.31
Philip Smith
usually #1 Male Doubles 50%, also #2 Male Doubles 50% · published
3.16
Matthew Harvey
usually #2 Male Doubles 50%, also #1 Male Doubles 38% · published
2.57
Rudolph Boleslav
usually #2 Male Doubles 67%, also #1 Male Doubles 33% · published
2.37
David Strack
published 2.5
Michael Moran
published
Nicholas Rys
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Passalacqua
6W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
C Thomas Hogge
9W–4L career · type S · 12 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.34
Philip Smith
13W–35L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.31
Matthew Harvey
21W–40L career · 16 lines in 2026
13%87%1%
3.16
Rudolph Boleslav
2W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
2.57
2.5
David Strack
1W–13L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%82%18%
2.37
Michael Moran
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Nicholas Rys
2W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.