Teams

1-JByrd/SLlewellyn-Eno

2023 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men Evening

8 players · average NTRP 4.44 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-07-18vs 2-KMoyung-EnoWon 20
W#1 SinglesMatthew Hanauer vs Chris Mansfield6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesSpencer Llewellyn vs Sean Berman6-3, 6-2
2023-07-11vs 3-JCabell-EnoLost 02
L#1 SinglesMatthew Hanauer vs Zack Czajkowski0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesSpencer Llewellyn vs Ryan Sayko3-6, 3-6
2023-06-30Won 10
W#2 SinglesBrett Eckles vs James Schap6-1, 6-0
2023-06-29vs 5-MCurry/Byrd-EnoLost 12
L#1 SinglesSpencer Llewellyn vs Visakan Jayakumar6-7, 3-6
W#2 SinglesMatthew Hanauer vs Thomas Gaither6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 SinglesBrett Eckles vs Nicholas Lau2-6, 3-6
2023-06-20vs 7-RBerliner-EnoWon 10
W#3 SinglesSpencer Llewellyn vs Aubry Carmody6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.18 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Brett Eckles
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.28
Spencer Llewellyn
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 4.5
Henry Kennelly
published 4.5
4.25
Gaurav Luther
published 4.5
4.16
Matthew Hanauer
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 4.5
4.12
Edwin Maffiold
published 4.5
4.06
Jermaine Byrd
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4.5
3.95
Craig Radley
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Spencer Llewellyn + Matthew Hanauer9556% games+1.8% vs expected
Jermaine Byrd + Brett Eckles3255% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brett Eckles
223W–95L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
4.41
4.5
Spencer Llewellyn
231W–157L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
4.28
4.5
Henry Kennelly
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Gaurav Luther
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Matthew Hanauer
163W–105L career · 5 lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
4.16
4.5
Edwin Maffiold
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
4.12
4.5
Jermaine Byrd
136W–127L career · 2 lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
4.06
4
Craig Radley
13W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.95

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.