Teams

DiLeo

2026 Iowa Tri-Level League · 3.5-4.0-4.5 Men (East)

10 players · average NTRP 4.07 / IOWA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-07-27vs Croy-GoettelWon 21
W#1 DoublesThies Kolln / Dayton Stevens vs Noah Vint / Mark Steckel6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJohn Ottavi / James Moldenhauer vs Chris Miller / Quinn Robinson6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAngelo Fonseca / Jake Flanders vs Bryan Goettel / Steve Armstrong3-6, 3-6
2026-07-13vs Croy-GoettelWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrad DiLeo / Dayton Stevens vs Nathan Williams / Adam Ernsting6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRyan Murphy / Pranav Puri vs Steven Nesteby / Mark Steckel6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDaniel Huff / Nathan Harmon vs Steve Armstrong / Bryan Goettel6-3, 6-3
2026-07-06vs Croy-GoettelSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBrad DiLeo / Thies Kolln vs Adam Ernsting / Nathan Williams6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDaniel Huff / Kevin Wu vs Bruce Croy / Chris Miller7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2026-06-22vs Croy-GoettelWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrad DiLeo / Anthony Forcucci vs Adam Ernsting / Mark Steckel6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesPranav Puri / Brendan Oneill vs Neel Modha / Chris Miller6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDaniel Huff / Kevin Wu vs Jack VonKampen / Jeremy Hagan6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5-4.0-4.5 Men (East)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DiLeo3193770
2Croy-Goettel133919123

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.93 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Dayton Stevens
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.31
Thies Kolln
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.28
Brad DiLeo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.25
Anthony Forcucci
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.06
Brendan Oneill
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
James Moldenhauer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Daniel Huff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Nathan Harmon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Jake Flanders
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Pranav Puri
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dayton Stevens
9W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
4.38
Thies Kolln
49W–40L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Brad DiLeo
21W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
4.28
4.5
Anthony Forcucci
13W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
3%95%3%
4.25
4
Brendan Oneill
10W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%33%67%
4.06
4
James Moldenhauer
3W–5L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Daniel Huff
11W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.50
Nathan Harmon
6W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Jake Flanders
15W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
Pranav Puri
8W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.