Teams

SGV Underdogs Deuces-Chang-Diamond Bar HS/SU8

2025 SoCal Doubles 18 & Over - San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Men 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
W#1 DoublesSandeep Kamalon / Derek Novacek vs David Chian / Tyson Wang6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBasudev Thoppai Vidyasankar / Yijun Zhang vs Vacheh W Avanessian / Clay Tweel2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesJuan Ramirez / Pavan Akkimsetty vs Timothy Lin / Stanley Phu7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAndy Hsieh / Sandeep Kamalon vs Kawnmai Sumlut / Balaji Alahari4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Pavan Akkimsetty
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Sandeep Kamalon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
CHENG QIAN
published 3.5
Chinna Ponnaganti
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Derek Novacek
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Yijun Zhang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Basudev Thoppai Vidyasankar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Russel Segawa
published
2.96
Andy Hsieh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.92
Sean Chang
published
Juan Ramirez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sanjaye Elayattu
published
Troy de la Cruz
published
Yibo Gu
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pavan Akkimsetty
10W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Sandeep Kamalon
11W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
CHENG QIAN
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Chinna Ponnaganti
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Derek Novacek
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Yijun Zhang
11W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.21
3.5
Basudev Thoppai Vidyasankar
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Russel Segawa
2W–10L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.09
3.5
Andy Hsieh
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.96
Sean Chang
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
2.92
Juan Ramirez
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sanjaye Elayattu
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Troy de la Cruz
8W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Yibo Gu
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.