Teams

Payne 18s 3.0W Wed PM

2025 Piedmont USTA 18 & Over · WOMEN 3.0 18 & Over

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-14vs Brown/Profitt 18s 3.0W Wed PMSplit 22
L#1 DoublesCozetta Gaines / Ji Kim vs Kate Maffeo / Heather Lane2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesPam Fabros-Beuchat vs Nancy Stoddard6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesClara Gonzalez Flores / Rosemarie Palazzolo vs Allison Brown / Conny Wulff6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesRenee Hicks / Suki Gutierrez vs Kayla Perkinson / Michelle Newman3-6, 1-6
2025-05-07vs Siesling/Nall 18s 3.0W Wed PMWon 31
L#1 DoublesSuki Gutierrez / Pam Fabros-Beuchat vs Lauren Tankersley / Bridget Cornwall6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCozetta Gaines / Renee Hicks vs Jennifer Page / Jennifer Nall6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesRosemarie Palazzolo vs Sharlotte Brooks6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRhonda Wakefield / Jennifer Payne vs Alyssa Way / Mary Zimbro6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2025-04-23vs Albright 18s 3.0W Wed PMWon 21
W#1 DoublesPam Fabros-Beuchat / Cozetta Gaines vs Katie Breeding / Louise Albright6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Payne / Susan Barnes vs Tessa Olinger / Jenna Bialik-Speight6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesSuki Gutierrez vs Kathleen Mooney1-6, 3-6
2025-04-16vs Davis/Tyler 18s 3.0W Wed PMLost 05
L#1 DoublesSuki Gutierrez / Ji Kim vs Sloane McPeak / Ashton Choros1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesCozetta Gaines vs Audrey Snyder4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesClara Gonzalez Flores / Pam Fabros-Beuchat vs Hannah Richey / Cheryl Rankin3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesRosemarie Palazzolo vs Melissa Dolesh6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJennifer Payne / Renee Hicks vs Catherine Davis / Raychel Lockwood5-7, 6-7
2025-04-09vs Grayzer/Johnson 18s 3.0W Wed PMLost 04
L#1 DoublesSuki Gutierrez / Pam Fabros-Beuchat vs Ginger Ballard / Debbie Johnson6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesClara Gonzalez Flores vs Michele Matthews0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCozetta Gaines / Rosemarie Palazzolo vs Meredith Freeman / Jennifer Klein6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRenee Hicks / Ning Li vs Kathryn Roberts / Jamie Smedsmo3-6, 2-6
2025-03-26vs Tucker 18s 3.0W Wed PMLost 23
L#1 DoublesRosemarie Palazzolo / Ji Kim vs Tricia Burnett / Stephanie Adams5-7, 0-6
L#1 SinglesSuki Gutierrez vs Whitney Gansman4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRhonda Wakefield / Susan Barnes vs Linda Shuster / Melinda Tucker0-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesCozetta Gaines vs Rebecca McNeill6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Payne / Pam Fabros-Beuchat vs Carrie Hanger / Julia Saguier6-3, 6-1
2025-03-19vs Siesling/Nall 18s 3.0W Wed PMWon 31
W#1 DoublesCozetta Gaines / Rosemarie Palazzolo vs Jennifer Nall / Margaret Beck6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesPam Fabros-Beuchat vs Karen Hardesty6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesClara Gonzalez Flores / Renee Hicks vs Bridget Cornwall / Amber Siesling6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSuki Gutierrez / Jennifer Payne vs Lauren Tankersley / Jennifer Page7-6, 6-2
2025-03-12vs Brown/Profitt 18s 3.0W Wed PMLost 04
L#1 DoublesClara Gonzalez Flores / Pam Fabros-Beuchat vs Nancy Stoddard / Allison Brown4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesRosemarie Palazzolo vs Kayla Perkinson7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJi Kim / Renee Hicks vs Kate Maffeo / Michelle Newman2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 SinglesSuki Gutierrez vs Heather Lane0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Pam Fabros-Beuchat
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.97
Clara Gonzalez Flores
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.97
Rosemarie Palazzolo
usually #1 Doubles 29%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.87
Suki Gutierrez
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.81
Cozetta Gaines
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.52
Renee Hicks
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.52
Jennifer Payne
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.48
Rhonda Wakefield
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Renee Hicks + Jennifer Payne2440% games−2.9% vs expected
Renee Hicks + Suki Gutierrez033 matchesnot enough data
Clara Gonzalez Flores + Pam Fabros-Beuchat123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pam Fabros-Beuchat
25W–17L career · 8 lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.16
3
Clara Gonzalez Flores
43W–27L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Rosemarie Palazzolo
15W–14L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Suki Gutierrez
32W–43L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.87
3
Cozetta Gaines
17W–22L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
Renee Hicks
8W–28L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%44%56%
2.52
Jennifer Payne
17W–32L career · 5 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52
Rhonda Wakefield
6W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.