Teams

Pinellas/Holliday

2022 Pinellas Combo 18 & Over Weekend Summer · 8.5 W Saturday

11 players · average NTRP 4.25 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-28vs Countryside WillisSplit 11
L#2 DoublesSonia Patrick / Laurie Smith vs Kayla Dyer / Elizabeth Gerlach1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAspen Kahl / Prin Vasseur vs Michele Ironsmith / Jennifer Bell6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2022-08-27vs Countryside WillisLost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer Drukteinis / Julia van Diver vs Jillene Davis / Elizabeth Gerlach0-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-08-20vs Countryside WillisSplit 11
W#2 DoublesAsbel Giang / Laurie Smith vs Kayla Dyer / Kirsten Willis3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAspen Kahl / Jenny Hughes vs Lisa Freeman / Monica Sanchez3-6, 3-6
2022-08-06vs Countryside WillisLost 02
L#1 DoublesAsbel Giang / Laurie Smith vs Kirsten Willis / Michele Ironsmith1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSonia Patrick / Julia van Diver vs Jillene Davis / Jennifer Bell4-6, 4-6
2022-07-30vs Countryside WillisLost 01
L#2 DoublesPrin Vasseur / Sonia Patrick vs Kayla Dyer / Elizabeth Gerlach4-6, 4-6
2022-07-09vs Countryside WillisSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChristine Hammerschmidt / Sonia Patrick vs Michele Ironsmith / Elizabeth Gerlach3-5
W#3 DoublesMarcy Faircloth / Laurie Smith vs Jennifer Bell / Stephanie Geshel6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Asbel Giang
published 4.5
4.16
Sonia Patrick
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.12
Andrea Fajardo
published 4.5
4.05
3.94
Aspen Kahl
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.80
3.80
Eugene Holliday
published 4
3.74
Jenny Hughes
published
3.62
Laurie Smith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.59
Prin Vasseur
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.56
Julia van Diver
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Drukteinis + Aspen Kahl314 matchesnot enough data
Jenny Hughes + Laurie Smith213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Asbel Giang
7W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Sonia Patrick
95W–102L career · 4 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
4.16
4.5
Andrea Fajardo
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
4.12
4
Jennifer Drukteinis
74W–25L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%34%66%
4.05
4.5
Aspen Kahl
111W–53L career · 2 lines in 2022
69%31%<1%
3.94
4
Anne-Lucie Bouchard
30W–14L career · type A · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Eugene Holliday
7W–1L career · type M · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
Jenny Hughes
22W–18L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
Laurie Smith
232W–110L career · 4 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Prin Vasseur
126W–155L career · 2 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
Julia van Diver
100W–97L career · 2 lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.